Ultimately, it's a collective decision. Critics play a large role. They analyze the literary elements such as plot, character development, and writing style. For example, a critic might praise 'Ulysses' by James Joyce for its innovative stream - of - consciousness technique. Readers also have a say. If a book is widely read and loved over time, like 'Little Women', it becomes a candidate for being considered a great work of fiction.
There is no single entity that decides. Publishers can have an influence. If they promote a book heavily and it gains a large following, like 'Harry Potter' series, it might be considered a great work. Awards also play a part. A book that wins the Pulitzer Prize, such as 'Gilead', is often seen as a high - quality work. However, different cultures may have different views. In some Asian cultures, works like 'The Dream of the Red Chamber' are highly regarded, while in the Western world they may not be as well - known to the general public.
It's a combination of different groups. Scholars study the historical and cultural significance of works. For instance, they might recognize 'The Canterbury Tales' as a great work due to its importance in English literature history. Librarians and educators also contribute. They recommend books like 'The Catcher in the Rye' which have had a big impact on young readers. And the general public, through their purchasing and reading habits, can make a work like 'The Da Vinci Code' very popular and potentially a great work in the eyes of some.
There's no single entity that decides. It's a combination of factors. Literary critics play a big role. They analyze elements like plot, character development, and writing style. For example, they might praise the complex characters in 'War and Peace' by Tolstoy. But ordinary readers also have a say. If a book has mass appeal over generations, like 'The Adventures of Tom Sawyer', it can be considered great.
Ultimately, it's a combination of factors. Readers play a large part. If a large number of readers over time love a particular novel, it starts to gain the reputation of being a great one. Critics also have a say. Their reviews and analysis can bring attention to a novel's merits. For example, when 'One Hundred Years of Solitude' was first published, critics praised its unique narrative structure and exploration of family and time. Then there are literary scholars. They study the novel in the context of the writer's body of work and the literary history. However, it's not always a straightforward consensus. Some novels are considered great in one era but might be overlooked in another, and then rediscovered later.
Scholars study the historical and literary context of novels. They might consider how a novel was received when it was first published and how it has influenced other works over time. For instance, 'Ulysses' by James Joyce was initially controversial but over time has been recognized for its innovative use of language and stream - of - consciousness technique, which led to it being regarded as a great English novel by many in the academic world.
Literary critics play a significant role. They analyze novels based on various aspects such as writing style, themes, character development, and historical context. Their reviews and analyses can influence public perception. However, the general public also has a say. Popular novels that resonate with a large number of people can also be considered great. For instance, 'The Lord of the Rings' was very popular among the general public and also received critical acclaim, making it a strong contender for a great novel.
Well, 'The Great Gatsby' is surely one of the greatest works of fiction. F. Scott Fitzgerald's exploration of the American Dream and the decadence of the wealthy is masterful. 'Moby - Dick' by Herman Melville is a classic too. Its in - depth look at obsession and the human struggle against nature is fascinating. And don't forget 'War and Peace' by Leo Tolstoy, which gives a vast and detailed account of Russian society during war and peace.
Some of the greatest works could include '1984' by George Orwell. It shows a dystopian future with totalitarian control. Another is 'Brave New World' by Aldous Huxley, which presents a society based on pleasure and control through science. And 'Dune' by Frank Herbert, with its complex world - building, political intrigue and unique ecological concepts.
The Pulitzer Prize for Fiction is decided by the Pulitzer Prize Board. This board is made up of journalists, editors, and academics. They carefully review the nominated works and select the winner based on the criteria of excellence in fiction writing.
It's a collective effort. Fans, critics, and scholars all play a part in determining the 'canon of science fiction'. Their opinions, reviews, and academic studies contribute to which works are considered part of the canon.
There are multiple parties involved. Literary reviewers in major publications can influence this. Also, book award panels which consist of experts in the field of literature, editors, and sometimes even well - known authors. They read through a lot of new British fiction and use their combined judgment to decide which ones are the best. Additionally, readers' feedback and popularity can also contribute to what is considered the 'best new british fiction' as high - selling and highly - rated books tend to get noticed more.
Some of the greatest detective fictions include Edgar Allan Poe's 'The Murders in the Rue Morgue'. It is often regarded as the first modern detective story. 'The Maltese Falcon' by Dashiell Hammett is also a must - read. It introduced a new type of tough detective in Sam Spade. And Wilkie Collins' 'The Moonstone' is an early and important example, with its complex plot and multiple narrators.