Perhaps some people with very conservative views might consider reading novels a waste of time and thus label it as 'guilty'. They might believe that one should focus only on more 'productive' or 'practical' activities. But this view is quite narrow - minded.
One possible reason could be that in a certain social or cultural context where reading novels was seen as a frivolous or unproductive activity. However, this view fails to recognize the value that novels can bring, such as expanding vocabulary, enhancing empathy, and understanding different historical periods. Thackeray's reading of novels was likely an important part of his creative and intellectual growth, not something to be condemned.
If someone thought Thackeray was guilty for reading novels, it could be because they had a misaligned view of literature. They might not understand that novels are not just entertainment but also a form of art and a way to convey complex ideas. They may have thought that Thackeray should have been spending his time on other things, but this ignores the fact that reading novels could have been crucial for his development as a writer. Reading novels can expose a writer to different narrative techniques, character development methods, and thematic concepts, all of which are essential for creating great works of literature.
I don't think Thackeray should be considered guilty for reading novels. Reading novels can be a form of self - education and a way to explore different cultures, ideas, and human experiences. Thackeray was likely influenced by the novels he read in his own writing career. It's not a matter of guilt but rather a natural part of an author's growth and development.
Maybe she was wearing very loose-fitting shorts or a long dress that gave the wrong impression. Some clothing styles can be deceiving and make it seem like someone isn't wearing underwear when they actually are.
In some stories, it could be due to a magic spell. Just like in fairy tales, a wicked witch or an inexperienced wizard might accidentally cast a spell that changes a person's gender. Another reason could be a scientific experiment. Scientists might be trying to do something revolutionary like gender transformation through some new technology, but things go wrong and a male turns into a girl.
No. Reading novels is a common form of entertainment and knowledge acquisition. There's no reason to consider it a guilty act. Trollope, like anyone else, has the right to enjoy novels.
If Trollope had made a prior commitment to study for an exam or complete a work - related task and he neglected it to read novels, then he might feel guilty. However, this is more about breaking his own or others' expectations rather than reading novels being an inherently guilty act.
One reason could be for a performance, like in a play or a movie. Just like in Shakespeare's plays where male actors used to play female roles and had to be dressed in girl clothes. Another reason might be for a bet or a dare among friends. For example, if someone lost a bet, they might have to wear girl clothes as a consequence.
Maybe they're just exploring very dark and edgy ideas without considering the implications. Some people might think it's a way to show a different side of the character, but it's a very wrong approach.
She could be mentally ill. Some mental disorders can cause people to act irrationally and aggressively.
Maybe they had a bad experience related to the ideas in romance novels, like a broken heart and they associate the genre with false hopes.
The complex characters. In detective novels, there are often well - developed characters, both the detectives and the suspects. Those who enjoy this genre might be attracted to these complex portrayals.