What are the differences between the '3 Little Pigs' story and its possible true version?

In 'Three Little Pigs', the pigs are seen as the victims and the wolf as the villain. But in 'The True Story', the wolf might have a different side. Maybe he was just looking for some sugar and had a cold which made his huffing and puffing seem more menacing than it was.

In the original, the pigs are clearly the good guys. They build their houses and the wolf is just a menacing intruder. But in the dark story, as I said before, the pigs might have done something wrong first. Also, the ending in the original is that the pigs are safe and the wolf is defeated. In the dark version, it could be that the wolf has a more sympathetic backstory or the pigs don't necessarily win in the end.

Well, in the traditional three little pigs story, the pigs build their houses and the wolf is clearly the bad guy who wants to devour them. However, in the true story of the three little pigs, it's told from the wolf's point of view. He was just out to get some sugar for his granny's cake. His huffing and puffing were because of a cold, not because he was trying to be menacing. And the third pig's behavior towards him seems less justifiable in this new version.

The first pig's house is made of straw, which is very weak. The second pig's house is of sticks, stronger than straw but still not very solid. The third pig's house is made of bricks, which is very strong.

The British version of the story often has a more detailed description of the countryside where the pigs live. The language used is more proper and perhaps a bit more old - fashioned. For example, the dialogue between the pigs and the wolf might have words like 'prithee' or 'thou'. Also, the way the pigs outwit the wolf could be more in line with traditional British cunning. They might use local knowledge of the area, like hiding in a nearby haystack which is a common feature in the British countryside.

In the traditional story, the three little pigs are the heroes and the wolf is the villain. The pigs build their houses and the wolf tries to eat them. In the 'true story', the wolf claims he was misjudged. He says he had innocent intentions like borrowing sugar.

In the true story, the wolf is not a villain. In the traditional version, the wolf is seen as a menacing figure who wants to eat the pigs. But in the true story, he just wants some sugar. Also, the pigs' reactions seem more extreme in the traditional story as they immediately assume the wolf is there to harm them without really trying to understand his intentions.

Well, in the French version, the pigs might have different personalities. Maybe they are more flamboyant or something. And the wolf could be more sly in a French way. Also, the houses they build could have a French architectural touch perhaps.

In a modern version, the pigs might use modern technology. For example, instead of just straw, sticks and bricks, one pig could use steel frames which are common in modern building. Also, the wolf might use modern tools to try to break in, like a power drill. And the pigs could communicate with each other via smartphones and call for help quickly.

The '3 Little Pigs' is a children's fable mainly about three pigs building different houses to protect themselves from the wolf. 'West Side Story' is a complex musical about rival gangs in New York. One similarity could be that in both there are elements of conflict. In '3 Little Pigs', it's the pigs vs the wolf. In 'West Side Story', it's the Jets vs the Sharks. But the settings are very different. '3 Little Pigs' is in a fairy - tale like rural setting while 'West Side Story' is in an urban New York setting. Also, the themes are different. '3 Little Pigs' focuses on the importance of hard work and preparation as the pigs that build sturdy houses survive. 'West Side Story' deals with themes like love in a difficult situation, racial tensions and gang rivalries.