There's no single entity that decides. Critics play a large role. They analyze aspects like writing style, character development, and thematic depth. For example, literary critics in respected publications often give high praise to novels with unique and engaging prose.
Literary scholars, through their study and research, contribute to the idea of which novels are the best written. They might look at historical context, the influence a novel has had on subsequent literature, and how it fits into the overall canon of literature. Awards like the Pulitzer Prize or the Man Booker Prize can also be an indication, but they don't solely define the 'best written' status as there are many great novels that may not have won such awards.
Ultimately, it's a matter of personal preference. Different readers may have different criteria for what makes a novel the 'best'. Some might focus on the historical accuracy, while others on the development of characters or the excitement of the plot.
Book clubs and literary communities also influence which novels are considered the best loved. They discuss and recommend books to each other. A novel like 'Gone with the Wind' has been a staple in many book clubs, and its popularity in these groups has added to its status as a well - loved American novel.
Typically, a panel of judges decides the award for best novel. These judges are often made up of literary critics, authors, and sometimes representatives from the publishing industry.
It could be a combination of different entities. Some well - known literary institutions or magazines might put together a panel of experts. These experts have studied literature extensively and can judge a novel based on its literary merit. For example, they might look at how well a novel uses symbolism or how it develops its characters over time. Sometimes, book clubs or groups of avid readers also contribute to the idea of what should be in the '100 best novels' through their discussions and preferences.
Scholars study the historical and literary context of novels. They might consider how a novel was received when it was first published and how it has influenced other works over time. For instance, 'Ulysses' by James Joyce was initially controversial but over time has been recognized for its innovative use of language and stream - of - consciousness technique, which led to it being regarded as a great English novel by many in the academic world.
Typically, a panel of judges decides the award for best children's novel. These judges can be made up of librarians, who are very familiar with children's literature. They know what books are popular among young readers and which ones have educational value.
The Mystery Readers International decides the Macavity Awards for Best Mystery Novel.
Literary critics play a significant role. They analyze novels based on various aspects such as writing style, themes, character development, and historical context. Their reviews and analyses can influence public perception. However, the general public also has a say. Popular novels that resonate with a large number of people can also be considered great. For instance, 'The Lord of the Rings' was very popular among the general public and also received critical acclaim, making it a strong contender for a great novel.
It's a combination of things really. Readers play a huge part. If a large number of readers love a science fiction book and recommend it to others, it starts to gain a reputation as one of the best. Critics also have a say. Professional book critics who specialize in science fiction can highlight a book's strengths, such as its unique concepts, well - developed characters, or engaging plot. Awards also contribute. For example, the Hugo and Nebula awards are highly respected in the science fiction community. Winning one of these awards often puts a book in the 'best' category.
Ultimately, it's a combination of factors. Readers play a large part. If a large number of readers over time love a particular novel, it starts to gain the reputation of being a great one. Critics also have a say. Their reviews and analysis can bring attention to a novel's merits. For example, when 'One Hundred Years of Solitude' was first published, critics praised its unique narrative structure and exploration of family and time. Then there are literary scholars. They study the novel in the context of the writer's body of work and the literary history. However, it's not always a straightforward consensus. Some novels are considered great in one era but might be overlooked in another, and then rediscovered later.