The Hollow Earth: Fact or Fiction? What are the main arguments against it?

For the 'fact' side, some point to strange ancient structures like Stonehenge that seem difficult to build with the technology of the time. However, against it, archaeologists have shown that humans were quite capable of such feats through trial and error and the development of specialized skills. For example, the way the stones were cut and placed at Stonehenge can be understood as a result of the knowledge and tools available to the ancient people who built it.

Fiction. There is no scientific evidence to support the existence of a hollow earth. Modern seismology, for example, shows that the earth has a solid inner core, a liquid outer core, a mantle, and a crust. These layers are well - studied through various methods like earthquake wave analysis. The idea of a hollow earth is more of a science - fiction concept that has no basis in real geological knowledge.

It's fiction. There is no scientific evidence to support the idea of a hollow earth. Modern seismology, for example, shows that the Earth has a solid inner core, a liquid outer core, a thick mantle, and a crust. All the data from deep - earth studies indicate a solid, layered structure rather than a hollow one.

One reason against science fiction could be that it's often seen as too far - fetched. Some people think that the concepts like time travel or alien invasions are completely unrealistic and have no basis in real life, so they consider it a waste of time to engage with such stories.

One argument against reading fiction is that it's seen as a waste of time. Some people think that time could be better spent on non - fictional works like self - help books or educational textbooks that directly contribute to knowledge acquisition or career development.

The argument for 'genesis fact' can be based on the consistency within religious teachings. In the context of the Genesis account in the Bible, it has been passed down through generations as a fundamental part of religious belief. It provides a comprehensive view of the origin of the world, life, and human beings. Some also believe that there are elements in the Genesis story that cannot be fully explained by science alone, such as the origin of consciousness, and thus see it as a factual account of creation.

One argument for it being a fact is that there are anecdotal reports from many individuals who claim that reducing their exposure to electromagnetic fields improves their symptoms. But the main argument for it being fiction is that when these cases are studied scientifically, the symptoms don't seem to be related to the electromagnetic fields at all. There's no clear biological mechanism that can explain how such a hypersensitivity could occur. The body is already exposed to a wide range of electromagnetic fields in nature, and it has not evolved a specific hypersensitivity to man - made ones in such a short time.

Authors against fanfiction may argue that it can interfere with their ability to monetize their work. If a lot of fanfiction is out there for free, it could potentially reduce the market for official spin - offs or sequels. Also, they might worry about the quality control. Fanfiction varies widely in quality and an association with low - quality fan works could potentially harm an author's reputation.

Adventure is a major theme. Characters in these books often embark on dangerous and exciting journeys into the hollow earth. For example, in 'At the Earth's Core', the protagonists face numerous challenges as they explore the strange inner world.

Yes, one strong argument is that it can be a distraction from real - life issues. For instance, if someone is constantly immersed in fictional worlds, they might neglect important things like personal relationships or career - building.