How can a time paradox story be resolved?

Another ending could be that the time traveler enters a parallel universe instead of their own past. So, any actions they take don't create a paradox in their original timeline. For example, if they kill someone who looks like their grandfather in this parallel universe, it doesn't affect their own existence in their home universe.

Well, the 'paradox of time story' could be about different things. One common aspect is the idea of circular time. Say there's a story where an event in the future causes an event in the past, which then leads to the future event again. It's like a loop that defies our linear view of time. Another might be the twin paradox in relativity, where one twin traveling at high speed ages slower than the other, creating a strange situation regarding time's passage.

A different approach is self - correction. In some time travel paradox fictions, the universe has a way of self - correcting. So if you try to create a grandfather - paradox - like situation, some force in the universe will prevent you from doing so. It could be something as simple as events conspiring to stop you from making that final, paradox - creating action, like your gun jamming when you try to shoot your grandfather in the past.

In a paradox time travel story, causality is often disrupted. One type could be the predestination paradox. Say a time traveler goes back to give a famous scientist an idea that leads to a great invention. But it turns out that the time traveler only knew about the idea because of the invention in the first place. It makes you wonder about the nature of time and whether events are fixed or can be changed.

Here is an ontological time paradox story. A man finds a strange device that allows him to send messages back in time. He sends a message to his younger self warning about a future event that would cause him great harm. His younger self heeds the warning and avoids the event. But then, the future from which the original message was sent no longer exists because the event didn't happen. So, how could the message have been sent in the first place? This is the essence of the ontological time paradox in this story.

The time traveller paradox story often involves the idea of going back in time and causing changes that seem to create contradictions. For example, if you go back in time and prevent your own birth. It challenges our understanding of causality. If the event that led to your existence is undone, how can you exist to go back in time in the first place? It's a mind - boggling concept that makes us question the nature of time and the possibility of time travel.

One way is through compromise. If the conflict is between characters, they might find a middle ground. For example, two friends who argued over a shared possession could decide to take turns using it. Another way is through a change in character. A character might realize their mistake and change their ways, thus ending the conflict. For instance, a bully in a story could become kind after learning the error of their ways.

Conflict in a story can be resolved in several ways. Firstly, through communication. If characters talk about their differences, they may understand each other better and resolve the conflict. For example, in a romantic story where the couple is having a misunderstanding, a heart - to - heart talk can clear things up. Secondly, self - realization. If it's a character vs. self conflict, the character can come to terms with their own issues. And finally, external intervention. A third party might step in to resolve a character vs. character or character vs. society conflict.

To deal with the problems, we could make the rules of time travel more explicit. For instance, if the story says that the past is unchangeable, then any attempt to change it would be futile. This would avoid the paradoxes. Also, for the power dynamics problem, we could introduce limitations on time travel. For example, only certain people with special abilities can time travel, and they are bound by strict ethical and physical rules. Regarding the issues with causality, we could use circular causality where events are self - fulfilling. So instead of creating paradoxes, things work in a loop that makes sense within the story's logic.

It could happen if the actions of this single person in different time periods conflict and cause logical inconsistencies.