What are the main differences between the 'Howards End' novel and its adaptations?

There aren't many major differences. The adaptations usually try to stay true to the core of the manga.

The novel has more detailed character development and inner thoughts. Adaptations often have to cut or simplify some plotlines to fit the screen time.

There aren't many major differences. The comic and its adaptations mostly stay true to the core story and characters.

There aren't many major differences. The adaptations generally stick closely to the manga's core plot and characters.

Well, usually differences could be in the visual style, the way events are ordered, or maybe the emphasis placed on certain plot points. It varies a lot depending on who's doing the adaptation.

Not many. The manga and its adaptations usually stick to the core story and characters.

Not many differences. The manga and its adaptations generally stay consistent in terms of plot and characters.

The main differences lie in the visual presentation and some minor plot tweaks. The manga might have more detailed character thoughts and background info.

There aren't many major differences. The manga and its adaptations usually maintain the core story and characters.

The real - life elements that might have inspired the story of Quasimodo were probably much grimmer. In fictional adaptations, there is often a need to make the story more palatable to a wide audience. So, while the real - life situation in medieval Paris might have been full of harsher social hierarchies and more extreme outcasting of the deformed, in fictional versions, Quasimodo's story is often softened. For instance, his relationship with Esmeralda is more idealized in fictional works than what might have been the reality of relationships between different social classes in the historical context.