A conclusion drawn based on evidence from the story is often considered reliable. Why?

One way is to cross - check the story with other sources. If multiple people tell similar stories, it adds more credibility. For example, in historical research, if different accounts from different witnesses or diaries match up, the evidence becomes stronger. Another way is to look for consistency within the story itself. If the details don't contradict each other, it's more reliable. Also, trying to find objective facts within the story can help. If a story mentions a specific date or location that can be verified, it makes the overall evidence more trustworthy.

Well, it's not very reliable at all. Just think about it. One person might have had a unique experience that others won't have. Their story could be colored by their own emotions, beliefs, or misunderstandings. In a court case, a single witness's story needs to be cross - examined thoroughly because it might not tell the whole truth.

No, fiction is not a reliable type of evidence. It's made-up stories and not based on real facts or events.

It has elements like time travel and alternate dimensions, which are typical of science fiction. The story explores concepts beyond our current scientific understanding, making it a clear example.

It's hard to say they are reliable. While some past life evidence stories seem very convincing, there is no scientific method that can fully prove that they are real accounts of past lives. There are often alternative explanations such as psychological factors or coincidence. For example, a person might seem to recall a past life event but it could be a result of a vivid dream influenced by something they experienced in their current life.

Basically, a long drawn out story is when the plot progresses very slowly, maybe with lots of repetitive or unimportant elements. It can make the reader or viewer feel like it's taking forever to get to the main points or conclusion.

Science fiction often explores future scenarios based on scientific principles and human progress. This emphasis on science and reason might lead to less reliance on religious or divine explanations, thus being seen as atheistic. Also, it might question traditional religious beliefs when imagining advanced civilizations and their values.

Well, a lot of American fiction is sad because it aims to explore the complexity of human emotions and experiences. It shows the darker sides of life, which can evoke strong feelings of sadness in readers. Another reason could be that it helps us understand and empathize with difficult situations.

I think it's because some have weak plots or poorly developed characters. They might lack originality or depth.

Science fiction might be seen that way because it often explores concepts based on science and rationality rather than religious beliefs. It focuses more on technological and scientific advancements, leaving less room for supernatural or divine explanations.