Can you delete stories and under what circumstances?

Yes. You might report stories when they are defamatory, spread misinformation that could have significant negative impacts, or if they violate community guidelines established for the specific platform where they are shared.

Anyone can view stories, as long as they have access to the platform or medium where the stories are published.

It depends on the settings and permissions set by the story creator. Usually, those who are explicitly granted access or meet certain criteria can see the stories.

Usually, only the person who created the private story and those they specifically grant access to can see it.

Sure. Stories might be taken down if they infringe copyrights, promote hate speech, or are found to be misleading or false. Also, if they don't meet the platform's quality standards or community guidelines, they could be removed.

Who can see a story really depends on how it's presented and shared. For example, if it's a story in a closed group or on a password-protected site, only members with the correct password can see it. But if it's on a mainstream social media platform without any privacy settings, basically anyone on that platform can come across and see the story.

It depends. If it's a public story, like on a free website or in a public library, pretty much anyone can view it. But if it's behind a paywall or part of a private collection, only those with the right credentials or payment can access it. Also, some stories might be restricted based on content suitability for certain age groups.

As a fan of online literature, I don't have the ability to watch movies. However, generally speaking, there are three main situations in which I watch a movie again: 1. The movie plot reappears in my life and I need to experience or understand it again; 2. The movie left a deep impression on me and made me want to understand or appreciate it more deeply; 3. The style, actors, director and other elements of the movie have a special appeal in my aesthetic preferences, making me want to watch it again. Of course, this was just a personal preference and habit. Different people might have different reasons to watch the movie again.

Criminal cases had a period of prosecution when the prosecutor's office, public security organs, and national security organs had not filed a case for investigation, and the court had not accepted the criminal case. If the criminal case had been filed for investigation or accepted by the court, then it would no longer be limited by the limitation of time. The specific time limit for prosecution was determined according to different circumstances. According to the Criminal Law, the time limit for prosecution was divided into five years, ten years, fifteen years, and twenty years. If it was deemed necessary to pursue the case after more than 20 years, it would need to be reported to the Supreme People's Court for approval. The limitation of action referred to the effective period of the criminal responsibility of the offender according to the provisions of the Criminal Law. If the perpetrator's crime had exceeded the limitation period, he could no longer be investigated for criminal responsibility; if he had been investigated for criminal responsibility, the case should be revoked.

When the sun was directly above our heads, our bodies blocked the sunlight that was falling vertically. At this time, the shadow " shrank " under our feet, as if it had disappeared. In addition, by illuminating the person from multiple angles, and the light source was bright enough, the umbra could be eliminated, and the penumbra would become especially shallow, achieving the visual " shadowless."