Coco is definitely fiction. It's a world crafted by the creators' imaginations, filled with unique characters and scenarios that have no basis in reality.
Coco is purely a work of fiction. The story and its characters were imagined by the creative team to bring a unique and touching narrative to the screen. There's no real-life basis for it.
Coco has roots in real cultural and historical aspects, but the specific plot and characters are created for the film. So, it's a blend of imagination and inspiration from real life.
In a way. While not a direct retelling of a specific real story, Coco draws heavily from the rich and diverse heritage of Mexican culture, giving it a sense of reality and depth.
1984 is definitely fiction. It's a dystopian novel written by George Orwell.
It could be either. Sometimes it's pure fiction, made up from the author's imagination. Other times, it might draw inspiration from real-life incidents and be slightly modified.
In general, jungle fiction is not based on real events. It's more about creating an adventurous and imaginative world within the jungle setting. Authors often draw from various sources of inspiration to craft the storylines.
Yellowstone is fictional. It's a creation for entertainment purposes.
Samson is typically regarded as fiction. The tales about him have elements that are more common in fictional narratives, with exaggerated feats and supernatural aspects that are not typical of real-life occurrences.
Beowulf is purely fictional. The characters, settings, and events in the story are products of imagination and literary creativity. It doesn't have any roots in real history or factual occurrences.
No way. Many fictions are purely fictional creations that aim to entertain or convey certain themes and messages through invented circumstances and characters.