Is A.T. Fomenko's book history fiction or science?

It's more like history fiction. A.T. Fomenko's works often present unconventional and controversial interpretations that deviate from mainstream historical scholarship.

The history of science fiction books is quite long. It dates back to ancient times when works like Lucian's 'True History' had elements of what we now consider science fiction. In the 19th century, Jules Verne was a key figure with books like 'Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea'. His works often involved futuristic technology and exploration. H.G. Wells also made great contributions with 'The War of the Worlds', which explored the idea of alien invasion. These early works laid the foundation for the diverse and expansive genre we have today.

I think science books are more interesting. They open up the mysteries of the universe, from the tiniest particles to the vastness of space. Reading a science book like 'A Brief History of Time' by Stephen Hawking can expand your knowledge of physics and cosmology in a profound way. It makes you think about the origin and future of the universe, and how everything is interconnected.

One of the early and often considered as a pioneer in military science fiction is 'The War of the Worlds' by H.G. Wells. It was published in 1898. It features an alien invasion and military responses to it, which are elements that became important in the military science fiction genre.

In science fiction, history can be a powerful tool. Some stories search for lost histories or forgotten civilizations. 'Stargate' is a good example. The series delves into the idea of an ancient, advanced civilization that has been lost to time. Through the use of science - fictional elements like wormholes, the characters explore these historical mysteries. It shows that science fiction can be a way to rediscover and reevaluate history in a new and exciting way.

Futurism has had a significant impact on the history of science fiction. It often involves imagining advanced technologies, new social structures, and different ways of living in the future. Many science fiction works draw inspiration from futurist ideas to create their fictional worlds.

The history of science fiction is significant because it shows how human ideas about the future and the unknown have evolved. It gives us a window into different time periods' hopes and fears. For example, early science fiction often showed excitement about new technologies, like space travel. This reflects the optimism of the time.

The history of science fiction is filled with different eras and trends. Early science fiction often focused on technological marvels and exploration. As time passed, it also started to deal with social and political issues. For example, in the mid - 20th century, science fiction in the United States was influenced by the Cold War. Stories like Isaac Asimov's 'Foundation' series not only had scientific concepts but also explored ideas about society, governance, and the future of humanity.

Well, in science fiction, the history of robots is really diverse. You've got Asimov's robots. His laws of robotics are super well - known. They were a way to try and regulate the behavior of these fictional robots. In movies like 'Metropolis', the robot was a symbol of the future, both exciting and a bit menacing. And then there are the more recent portrayals in things like 'Blade Runner' where the line between human and robot is so blurred it makes you think a lot about what it really means to be human.

Stalif Anos 'General History of the World was not a science fiction novel but a formal history book written by the historian Stalif Anos. It was a comprehensive historical work that covered the history of the world from primitive society to the 21st century. The book used time as a clue to classify and summarize historical events and explored the background, causes, and effects of each event in depth. At the same time," Global History " was also interwoven with some scientific, technological, political, and other aspects of knowledge to show the connection between history and the present. Therefore, although some of the content in the book might be inconsistent with historical facts, it was still a valuable historical book.