Is novel coronavirus worse than the flu?

The novel coronavirus is generally considered worse than flu. It has a higher rate of severe illness and complications, and its impact on healthcare systems has been much more significant.

Definitely. The novel coronavirus has had a much greater impact than the flu. It's more challenging to control, and its effects on global economies and healthcare systems have been far more profound.

In many ways, novel coronavirus has presented greater challenges than SARS. It spreads more easily and has affected a much larger number of people. However, the severity can vary depending on individual cases and healthcare responses in different regions.

In some aspects, yes. The novel coronavirus has spread more widely and affected a larger number of people globally compared to SARS.

Novel coronavirus is typically more lethal than flu. Flu has a relatively lower mortality rate, while the novel coronavirus has presented greater challenges and higher fatality rates in many situations.

Yes, novel coronavirus 2019 is generally considered more dangerous than the typical flu. It spreads more easily and has a higher mortality rate.

Definitely not. The novel coronavirus and flu are distinct. The virus that causes COVID-19 has different characteristics and effects on the body compared to the flu virus. For example, COVID-19 can cause more severe respiratory problems and has a higher potential for complications.

No, the flu and the novel coronavirus are not the same. They are caused by different viruses and have distinct characteristics.

No, coronavirus is not a form of flu. They are distinct viruses with different characteristics and effects on the body.

The novel coronavirus is not a flu. Flu viruses usually have predictable seasonal patterns and specific symptoms. COVID-19, on the other hand, presented with unique challenges and differences. It spreads differently and has caused a global pandemic of a different scale and nature.