It's hard to say for sure. There's not enough clear evidence to determine if it's true or not.
I'm not sure. It depends on a lot of factors like the source of the story and the credibility of the teller. Maybe more investigation is needed to know for sure.
Honestly, I don't know. It could be true, or it could just be a made-up tale. Without more details and verification, it's impossible to tell.
Hard to say for sure. There are different accounts and it's not straightforward to verify the authenticity.
It's hard to say for sure. Maybe some parts are true, but it could also be exaggerated for entertainment.
It's hard to say for sure. Some parts of his story might be true, but there could also be exaggerations or embellishments.
Hard to say for sure. There are elements that could be true, but also some that might be exaggerated.
I don't really know. There could be elements of truth in it, but it might also be largely fabricated. Without more information, it's difficult to tell.
I'm not sure. It's hard to tell for sure without more detailed information.
Hard to say for sure. There's no clear evidence to prove it one way or the other.
I'm not sure. There's not enough clear evidence to determine if it's true or not.
Well, it depends. Sometimes storytellers embellish or tweak the truth to make it more engaging. So, it's possible Bert Kreisher's story has some truth to it, but it might not be 100% accurate.
Hard to say for sure. Some parts might be exaggerated or fictionalized.