The movie 'Flood' is not based on a true story. It's a work of fiction that might draw inspiration from various sources but doesn't have a real-life basis. The plot and characters are invented for entertainment purposes.
Well, 'Flood' isn't based on a true story. It's a completely made-up tale that aims to thrill and engage the audience through creative storytelling rather than real events.
It's not a true story. The movie was created from the imagination of the writers and filmmakers. They came up with the story to entertain the audience rather than being based on real events.
Not really. 'The Flood' is more of a fictional creation rather than being rooted in real events.
It depends on how you define 'true story'. Some elements of 'After the Flood' are based on real incidents, but there might be fictionalized parts for dramatic effect.
I don't think it is. Usually, stories like this are crafted by the author's imagination to engage and touch the readers' hearts rather than being based on real events.
It's mostly a myth or legend. There's no scientific evidence to prove that a global flood of that scale ever happened.
It's a matter of belief. Some people think it's a true account based on religious teachings, while others view it as a symbolic or mythical story.
I'm not certain. It could be a completely fictional creation just made to evoke emotions or it could have roots in a true incident that was then elaborated upon for the story.
Yes. 'True Story' drew from real-life incidents and was adapted for the big screen. However, like many such adaptations, there could be minor alterations or embellishments to make it more engaging for the audience.
No, it's not. '300' is a fictionalized and stylized account of the Battle of Thermopylae.