Why do some stories end without the good guy winning?

It could be to add complexity and surprise. Making a seemingly good character turn bad shakes up the plot and keeps readers engaged.

Well, 'The End' is like a final stamp on a story. It's a clear and unambiguous statement that tells us the tale is over. It's a common and recognizable way to wrap things up and leave no room for confusion about whether there might be more to come.

Not too often. It's a risky move for a story. But when done well, it can make for a really interesting and thought-provoking plot. It challenges our assumptions and makes us question our notions of good and bad.

I think it might be because 30 marks a certain milestone or it's a tradition within that particular news organization. It's hard to say for sure without knowing more about their internal policies.

Sometimes, it's a way to shock the reader and make a stronger impact. Starting at the end adds an element of surprise and makes the story more memorable.

Sometimes, the meeting of lovers marks the fulfillment of a central goal or theme. After that, there might not be enough material to sustain the story without it feeling forced or losing its charm.

One example is 'Pride and Prejudice' by Jane Austen. Mr. Darcy is often considered a very attractive male character. The story focuses on love, social class, and family relations rather than sex stories.

It could be due to various factors like time constraints or the need to keep the narrative concise and focused.

Because they are often full of adventures and humor. His experiences are unique and different from mine, which makes them really interesting to listen to.

Maybe it's to keep things concise and not overstay their welcome. Sometimes, getting to the point quickly is the goal.