GDP is a limited metric. It doesn't take into account non-market activities, like volunteer work or home production. Moreover, it doesn't show the level of inequality within a society and how economic gains are shared among different groups.
GDP doesn't always tell the right story. GDP only measures the monetary value of final goods and services produced in a country. It doesn't account for inequality. A country may have a high GDP but a large portion of its population could be living in poverty. Also, it doesn't consider non - market activities like unpaid household work which is significant in every economy. And it doesn't take into account environmental degradation caused by the production processes that contribute to GDP growth.
I think GDP doesn't tell the right story. It focuses mainly on economic output. For instance, if a country has a high GDP due to a large amount of oil extraction, but the local communities are suffering from environmental damage and lack of basic services, GDP doesn't show this. It's a narrow measure that doesn't incorporate things like social cohesion or the resilience of the economy to shocks.
Maybe because they know some facts about the real - life story that the movie is based on that the movie didn't show. For example, if they knew of specific players who had unique experiences not in the movie.
Yes. GDP is a broad measure that generally gives a good indication of a country's economic health. It sums up the value of all goods and services produced within a country. Higher GDP often means more production, more jobs, and greater economic activity which are important aspects of a nation's economic situation.
Not always. GDP only measures economic output but doesn't account for things like quality of life, environmental impact, or income distribution.
Social media is often curated and filtered. People only show what they want others to see, not the full reality.
Maybe there was limited information available at the time of writing the report. Sometimes, key witnesses or evidence weren't found yet.
One reason could be the artist's creative choice. They may want to leave some parts open for the viewer's imagination.
One implication could be misinterpretation. Viewers might form inaccurate opinions based on the partial information presented in the artwork. For example, a painting that only shows a single moment of a historical event could lead people to misunderstand the entire event's complexity.
Well, social media doesn't tell the whole story because it's a platform where everyone is vying for attention. Users may exaggerate or distort facts to gain more likes and followers. Moreover, algorithms play a role. They show us what they think we want to see, not necessarily the whole truth.