It could be that the Bohrs comic doesn't provide the necessary information or doesn't fit the topic at hand. Sometimes, certain references just don't add value or make sense to bring up.
I think it might be because referring to the Bohrs comic could lead to confusion or might not support the main point you're trying to make. Maybe there are better, more appropriate sources to draw from instead.
I'm not sure exactly. Maybe there's something about the comic that makes it not suitable for reference or maybe there are better sources available.
Maybe there's something wrong with the comic or it doesn't meet the posting requirements.
It could be that the character had a deep sense of responsibility or a hidden connection to the situation that made them offer themselves instead. But again, it depends on the specific details and backstory in the comic.
Maybe it's not relevant to your current topic or it could have inaccurate or outdated information.
The ending of the comic could be controversial for several reasons. Maybe the character developments were not satisfactory, or the resolution was too predictable. Sometimes, it might not align with the tone set throughout the story.
Well, perhaps the comic is of poor quality, or it might not fit the theme or tone of our Twitter profile. Another possibility is that we don't have the rights to share it publicly.
I'm not really sure. It might be some kind of quirky or inside joke that's specific to a certain group or context.
It's funny because of its unique and unexpected punchlines.
It could imply a warning or threat, suggesting that the person doesn't want to have to resort to some action indicated by tapping the sign.
I'm not really sure. Maybe it means the speaker doesn't want to have to refer to that specific comic.