What does O'Brien mean by 'war stories are not moral'?

Maybe O'Brien thinks war is just too complex and chaotic to be neatly labeled as moral or immoral.

Well, Tim O'Brien might mean that a true war story is one that conveys the raw emotions and harsh realities of war without any sugarcoating or glorification.

It depends on the context of his writing. Maybe he means a story that accurately portrays the raw emotions and harsh realities of war without sugarcoating anything.

O'Brien might write war stories to give readers a deeper understanding of the realities and impacts of war. It could also be to honor the people he knew during those times or to raise awareness about certain issues related to warfare.

Maybe it's because he has deep personal experiences and emotions related to war that he wants to express through his writing.

Tim O'Brien might write war stories to express his emotions and thoughts about war, and to give a voice to those who went through it. Also, it could be a way to document history and ensure that the lessons of war are not forgotten.

Maybe it's because those war experiences have had a profound impact on him and he wants to share them.

It could be that O'Brien sees war stories as misleading, not showing the full impact on human lives and values. That's why he insists they're immoral. Also, sometimes these stories can romanticize war, which is far from the truth.

Tim O'Brien believes war stories often reveal the complexity and trauma of war, going beyond the surface-level events.

O'Brien says that war stories are both true and not true at the same time. It's a strange but thought-provoking statement.