Can a novel exist without a narrator?

Yes, it can. Some stories are told through the actions and dialogues of the characters alone, without a specific narrator guiding the reader/viewer.

Sure it can. Some novels are just for entertainment or to present a story without a clear moral lesson.

In theory, a novel could be without people. It might concentrate on describing a phenomenon, a place, or a series of abstract ideas. But it's quite rare and unconventional.

Yes, love can definitely exist without sex. Love is a complex emotion that encompasses deep affection, care, respect, and understanding for another person. There are many forms of love, such as platonic love between friends or the love within a family. These relationships are based on non - sexual aspects like shared values, common interests, and mutual support.

Yes, it can. Some stories focus more on concepts, settings, or events rather than specific characters.

In most cases, a story needs conflict. Without it, there's no growth for the characters, no obstacles to overcome, and no reason for the reader to keep turning the pages. Conflict is what makes a story engaging and meaningful.

Yes, it can. Some blogs are more like collections of thoughts, random musings, or just sharing information without a coherent story.

No way. A story without conflict would be pretty boring and lack any kind of tension or progression.

Sure it can. Some experimental or avant-garde stories might focus more on a concept or a group rather than a single protagonist.

I don't think a story can truly exist without a plot. A plot is what makes a story coherent and engaging. Without it, it's hard to have a meaningful and satisfying story experience.