Is a biography always a true story?

Most of the time, a biography is non-fiction. It aims to present an accurate account of a person's life, including events, experiences, and achievements. However, there might be some cases where a fictional element is added for artistic or narrative purposes, but that's rare.

Well, it depends. Some stories are meant to be true accounts, but others are purely for entertainment and have no basis in reality. It all comes down to the genre and the author's intent.

Not necessarily. Sometimes, details might be exaggerated or changed slightly to make the story more engaging.

It depends. A true story can be based on real events, but there could be some artistic license taken to make it more engaging. For example, characters' thoughts or conversations might be imagined.

Not necessarily. Sometimes a story labeled as 'true' might have some fictional elements added for dramatic effect or to fill in gaps in the known facts.

Not necessarily. Sometimes a story labeled as true might have some fictional elements added for dramatic effect or to fill in gaps in the known facts.

Not necessarily. Reality can be complex and perception of it varies from person to person. What one considers true might not be the same for another.

Not necessarily. A true story can be good, but it depends on how it's told and presented.

A narrative isn't always true. It could be completely fictional like in many novels and movies. Or it could be semi-biographical, where parts are real and others are fabricated for dramatic effect. So, the answer is no.

Yes, by definition, nonfiction is based on real events and facts, so it's supposed to be a true story.