There could be various reasons. It might be that the character didn't fit his acting style or he simply wasn't interested in the project at that time.
Maybe he wasn't offered the role or had scheduling conflicts.
There is no direct connection between John Cusack and 'Pulp Fiction'. 'Pulp Fiction' is a Quentin Tarantino movie known for its ensemble cast which doesn't include John Cusack.
No. There is no evidence to suggest that John Cusack was ever considered for a role in 'Pulp Fiction'.
Maybe he had scheduling conflicts or wasn't interested in the role.
Well, there could be a bunch of reasons. Maybe they had a soft spot for him, or they thought it would cause more trouble than it was worth. Or perhaps it was all part of a bigger plan that wasn't revealed yet.
Some people might not have liked it because of its violence or nonlinear narrative.
Maybe it was the style of storytelling that didn't click for you. Some people find it too nonlinear or hard to follow.
Maybe they had other motives or reasons that weren't obvious. Maybe killing Marvin wasn't part of their ultimate plan.
There could be a variety of reasons. Maybe they thought Marvin could be useful later, or they were afraid of the consequences of killing him. Or perhaps it was just a plot twist to keep the story interesting and unpredictable.
Maybe it was the director's creative choice to take a different path. Sometimes, they want to surprise the audience or add their own twist.
There could be several reasons. Maybe the other nominated films had more profound themes or better technical aspects. Or perhaps the voting panel had a different set of preferences that year.