What is the meaning of 'A true war story is never moral'?

It might suggest that the reality of war is often complex and defies simple moral judgments.

It means that a true war story often focuses on the human experiences, emotions, and personal impacts rather than just the battle itself.

A true war story often presents the raw and complex reality of war, which defies simple moral judgments. It shows the chaos, ambiguity, and the grey areas that make moral clarity impossible.

A true story may not always be a moral lesson because it simply presents events as they happened without necessarily having a clear moral message attached.

Basically, it expresses the idea that when it's true love, it continues on and doesn't come to a stop. It suggests that the depth and authenticity of love keep it going without a defined conclusion.

I'm not sure exactly. It could vary depending on the edition and formatting of the book. You might need to do a detailed search through the text.

Well, a true war story is never just about the victories and conquests. It's about the human experience, the trauma, and the unseen consequences that linger long after the battles end.

It likely implies that a genuine love story has no end or conclusion; it persists and endures over time.

It probably means that true love lasts forever and has no end. It's like a symbol of the eternal nature of genuine love.

I think it implies that the essence and power of true love are timeless and have no ending. Maybe it's a reminder to hold onto love and believe in its permanence.