Why is historical fiction considered bad?

Fiction isn't bad. It depends on how you look at it. For some, it might seem bad if it promotes negative values or is too violent. But mostly, it's a form of escape and creativity.

Some might think fiction is bad because it can sometimes be seen as a waste of time or an escape from reality instead of dealing with real-world issues.

Modern fiction might be seen as bad because it can be too formulaic. Plus, the quality of writing might not be up to par, and the characters and plots might feel rushed or underdeveloped.

One reason why fan fiction is regarded as bad is that it can potentially violate copyright laws if not handled properly. Another issue is that it might stray too far from the established canon of the original work, causing confusion among fans.

Fiction isn't necessarily bad for you. It can offer entertainment, expand your imagination, and provide different perspectives.

It might be that some YA fiction has weak plots or unconvincing characters. That could be a reason for the negative perception.

I don't think it's bad at all. It's a cult classic with unique storytelling and memorable characters.

I think it's all a matter of personal taste. Some people might not like the nonlinear storytelling or the violence in it.

Some people think it's bad because they find the concepts too far-fetched and hard to relate to in real life.

I think it's because people have different expectations and standards. Maybe the plot seems too convoluted or the characters aren't relatable. But it really depends on the individual's preferences and what they look for in a story.