It could be the protagonist themselves or a third-person narrator. It really depends on the author's choice.
Well, it could be a neutral observer who tells the story objectively. Or perhaps a character with a vested interest in the events. The answer is often found in the specific details and context of the story.
It could be the main character themselves. Sometimes authors use this technique to give a direct and personal account of the events.
I think it could be the main character themselves. Sometimes, the narrator is the person experiencing the events in the story.
I don't know exactly. You might want to look in a literary anthology or do a specific online search using relevant keywords to discover the author.
I'm not sure. You might have to check the credits or related information to find out.
Charles might be a key character or someone with an important role, but without more context, it's hard to say exactly.
It could be the author themselves or a character within the story. Without more specific context, it's hard to say for sure.
In 'A Wrinkle in Time,' the narration is primarily handled by Meg Murry. Her perspective gives us an intimate look into the strange and wonderful events of the story. Her voice helps us connect with the emotions and experiences of the characters.
Yes, it can be very good. It helps to express ideas and entertain others.
The thesis might be about the naivety of perception or the complexity of human nature.
The main theme of 'Charles' might center around the transformation and growth of characters. It could also explore themes like deception or the search for truth. Different readers might have different takes on it.