Which sells better, third-person or first-person novels?

Well, it varies. First person can make readers feel closer to the main character's thoughts and emotions. But third person allows for a more comprehensive view of multiple characters and events. It often comes down to the author's skill and the story's needs.

Well, it's not a simple choice. First person can really draw readers in by making them feel close to the main character. On the other hand, third person allows for a more comprehensive view of multiple characters and events. It often comes down to what suits the plot and themes of the novel best.

It depends on the story and the effect you want to create. First person can give a more intimate and immersive experience, but third person offers a broader perspective.

Third-person and first-person novels have their own advantages and disadvantages, depending on the writing style and storyline. Third-person writing allowed the readers to observe the protagonist and the plot from God's perspective, allowing them to have a deeper understanding of the characters and plot in the story. At the same time, it could better show the protagonist's personality and growth process. In addition, third-person writing could also increase the narrative of the story, making it easier for the readers to get involved in the story. But third-person writing can also cause some reading difficulties for readers because they can't really participate in the story. The first person writing style allowed the readers to feel the story and the emotions of the characters more directly. In first-person writing, the reader can have a deeper understanding of the inner world of the characters in the story, and can better understand and support the actions and decisions of the characters in the story. However, first-person writing can also cause some reading difficulties for readers because they need to understand and pay more attention to the emotions and behaviors of the characters in the story. Therefore, choosing to use the third or first person depended on the writing style and storyline. If you want to increase the narrative and storytelling of the story, you can choose to use the third person; if you want to more directly present the emotions and actions of the characters in the story, you can choose to use the first person.

I think it's subjective. First-person can be immersive, but third-person allows for a more objective and all-encompassing storytelling. Different novels succeed with either approach depending on how well it suits the plot and characters.

It depends on the story and the author's style. In some cases, the first person can give a more intimate and immersive experience for the reader. But third person allows for a broader perspective and can cover multiple characters and events more easily.

Third person also has its merits for a first novel. It gives a broader perspective. You can show different characters' actions and thoughts. Take 'Pride and Prejudice' as an example. Jane Austen uses third person to show the interactions and misunderstandings among various characters in the story. It allows for a more complex plot development and a wider view of the fictional world.

It depends on your taste. Some people love the immersive feel of first-person stories, while others prefer the broader perspective of third-person ones.

Whether it was better to write a fantasy novel in first or third person depended on the story and writing style. If the plot of the novel needed to reflect the feelings and mental journey of the protagonist, then using the first person might make it easier for the readers to resonate and emotionally invest. For example, if the protagonist of a novel was a magician or a charlatan who needed to show his/her magical abilities and inner contradictions, the first-person perspective could make the story more believable. On the other hand, if the plot of the novel was more focused on showing the interaction between the fantasy world and the characters, it might be more appropriate to use the third person. For example, if the protagonist of the novel was a demon king from another world, and his subordinates and allies were fantasy creatures from different worlds, then the third-person perspective could better unfold the communication and conflict between the characters. In general, writing a fantasy novel required one to decide whether to use the first or third person based on the story and writing style. No matter which perspective you choose, you need to be careful not to be too dull or distorted so that the reader can truly feel the charm of the fantasy world.

Is it better to write supernatural novels in the third person or the first person? When writing a supernatural novel, the use of the third or first person depended on the writing style and the theme of the story. Third-person writing style is more objective, allowing readers to observe and participate in the story more objectively, creating a better suspense and horror atmosphere. At the same time, it could also better show the personality, psychology, and actions of different characters to enhance the cohesiveness and legibility of the story. The first-person writing style is more subjective, allowing the readers to participate in the story more directly, better feel the protagonist's experience and feelings, and enhance the realism and appeal of the story. However, this way of writing might affect the cohesiveness and logic of the story and require more adjustments and embellishments. When considering whether to use the third person or the first person, one had to consider the writing style, story theme, character creation, narrative rhythm, and other factors to make a comprehensive consideration and choice.