Mostly fiction. Images of Jesus are often artistic interpretations or based on religious beliefs rather than concrete historical facts.
It's a mix. Some aspects of the common images of Jesus might have roots in historical and cultural influences, but a lot is also based on imagination and religious tradition. There's no clear-cut evidence to prove their absolute factual basis.
It's hard to say for sure. Images of Jesus can be a blend of both fact and fiction. Different cultures and artists have depicted him in various ways, and much of it depends on religious and symbolic interpretations rather than verified facts.
The Christmas Jesus birthday story is a complex blend. Some aspects might have a basis in historical context. For example, the Roman census was a real thing. But the more miraculous elements like the virgin birth are firmly in the realm of religious belief. Historians can't prove these supernatural parts, but for Christians, they are essential parts of the story and are accepted on faith.
I think it's more fiction than fact. The claims made in it seem pretty far-fetched and lack solid evidence.
It really depends. An accusation being fiction means it's completely untrue and fabricated. But if it's not, it might be based on partial or complete facts that need proper investigation to determine the truth.
The Crown is a blend of both. It takes inspiration from real events and people but also incorporates fictional elements for dramatic effect.
The Great Escape is rooted in fact. It was a remarkable event in history. The prisoners used their ingenuity to try and break free from the German camp. They faced numerous challenges in real life just as shown in the various accounts. However, when it comes to fictional elements, in some portrayals the relationships between the prisoners are enhanced or altered slightly for better story - telling. But the fact that there was a mass escape attempt by Allied POWs is very much true.
Game of Thrones is pure fiction. The storylines, characters, and settings are all made up by the author. There might be some elements inspired by history or human nature, but it's not directly based on facts.
Fox News isn't fiction. It presents news and commentary, but like any media outlet, the accuracy and interpretation can vary.
The novel was based on history, but the plot might have been adapted and modified.
Well, the 'Deadwood' HBO series is a blend. The town of Deadwood was a real place full of miners, gamblers, and outlaws during the gold rush. The show uses this fact as a foundation. But the complex web of relationships, the murders, and the power struggles among the characters are fictional. For example, the character of Seth Bullock was based on a real person, but his interactions with other fictional characters were made up for the drama of the show.
Peter Rabbit is mostly fiction. It's a charming story created for entertainment rather than being based on real events.