No, pulp fiction is not a rip-off. It's an original and unique creation with its own style and storylines.
I don't think pulp fiction is a rip-off. It stands on its own as a remarkable piece of fiction, with elements that are fresh and innovative, not copied from any other source.
Rip Torn has no relation to Pulp Fiction. Rip Torn is an actor in his own right, known for various works, but he is not part of Pulp Fiction. So in the context of Pulp Fiction, there is no significance regarding him.
No. 'Death Stranding' has its own unique and original concepts. It has a distinct story, world - building, and gameplay elements that are the result of the creative vision of its developers. While it may draw inspiration from general science - fiction themes, it is not a rip - off of any particular novel.
No. Rip Torn has no connection to Pulp Fiction.
Maybe. You need to look at factors like how much they charge for their services, how they market your comics, and whether they're transparent about sales and profits. If any of these seem unfair or sketchy, it could be a rip-off.
I'm not sure. You might need to check with the relevant platforms or media sources for the latest information.
Maybe it violated some platform's content policies or there were copyright issues.
I'm not sure specifically what the 'big cock rip off story' is without more context. It could potentially be a story about someone being cheated or deceived in a situation related to a large or important entity (if 'big cock' is used metaphorically here).
Not really. Each company has its own talented writers and artists who come up with original concepts. There might be some similarities due to the nature of the comic book genre, but that doesn't mean ideas were ripped off.
I'm not entirely sure what 'prayer off of pulp fiction' specifically means. It could potentially refer to a prayer that is somehow related to or inspired by the movie 'Pulp Fiction'. Maybe it's a reference to a particular scene in the movie that has a spiritual or prayer - like moment.
Maybe it violated some platform's content policies or licensing agreements.