How to argue effectively for a novel?

In a debate, one side would argue against the other side's point of view to strengthen their own point of view. The purpose of an argument was to let the audience better understand their point of view and persuade them to accept it. There were a few points to note in order to successfully defend: 1. Fully prepared: Before the debate, you need to fully study your own point of view and the other party's point of view and prepare a strong argument to refute the other party. 2. Grasp the key points: You need to grasp the key points of the other party's point of view and refute them forcefully. 3. Use logic: You need to use logical reasoning to prove your point of view so that the audience can better understand your point of view. 4. Good at communication: You need to be good at communication and effectively communicate with the audience so that the audience can better understand your point of view. 5. Maintain confidence: You need to maintain confidence in your argument and believe that your point of view is correct and that you can convince the other party to accept your point of view.

Perhaps they argue over a girl. They are both heroes and might have feelings for the same person. Jealousy and competition could spark an argument between them. Also, their loyalty to different camps, Camp Half - Blood and Camp Jupiter, could be a source of conflict. They might have different ideas on how to handle the relationship between the two camps, which would lead to arguments.

I don't think it can be argued that way. But if someone were to try, they might misinterpret the concept of the natural hierarchy in the pride lands as some form of fascist order. However, this is wrong as the hierarchy in the movie is more about the balance of nature and survival, not about oppression.

In Ash and Serena argue fanfiction, the arguments can stem from various reasons. Maybe it's about their different goals in Pokemon training. For example, Ash might be more focused on battling strong opponents to become a Pokemon Master, while Serena could be more interested in Pokemon contests and their elegance. This difference in focus can lead to heated debates between them.

Kant did not claim that fiction is inherently bad. His philosophical works dealt with broader issues of ethics and epistemology rather than specifically addressing the nature of fiction.

As a fan of online literature, I won't take the initiative to argue with anyone. Everyone had their own ideas and opinions, and these ideas and opinions were based on their own experience and knowledge. Therefore, when discussing famous sentences, we should respect each other's views, listen to each other's thoughts, and try to reach a consensus through dialogue and communication. This way, we can continue to improve our knowledge and experience to write better works.

One could argue that the secrecy and the sense of a hidden, exclusive community in Harry Potter resemble the Knight Templars. The Hogwarts School itself is like a fortress where knowledge (akin to the secrets of the Templars) is guarded. The different houses can be seen as different factions within a larger order, much like the hierarchical structure of the Templars. Also, the idea of a 'chosen one' in Harry Potter, which is Harry himself, has parallels to the idea of a special or anointed figure in the Templar - like legends.

At first, it could strain their friendship. There might be a period of coldness between them where they avoid each other.

If it's a minor argument, it could actually strengthen their relationship in the long run. By expressing their differences, they can better understand each other. For example, Naruto might realize how much Hinata worries about him during his missions.

One way to argue that 'Star Trek Discovery' is not science fiction is to look at its use of space and alien species. In true science fiction, these elements are often used to explore new ideas about evolution, intelligence, and the nature of the universe. If in 'Star Trek Discovery' the aliens are just there as set dressing for the human - centered drama and the space settings are not used to really dig into scientific concepts like relativity or the search for extraterrestrial life, then it may not be science fiction.