It's mostly a myth or legend. There's no scientific evidence to prove that a global flood of that scale ever happened.
The earth flood story is more of a fictional or symbolic tale. It doesn't have concrete historical or scientific validation. It might have originated from ancient myths and passed down through generations.
I don't think it is. Usually, stories like this are crafted by the author's imagination to engage and touch the readers' hearts rather than being based on real events.
Not really. 'The Flood' is more of a fictional creation rather than being rooted in real events.
It's a matter of belief. Some people think it's a true account based on religious teachings, while others view it as a symbolic or mythical story.
It's not a true story. The movie was created from the imagination of the writers and filmmakers. They came up with the story to entertain the audience rather than being based on real events.
The movie 'Flood' is not based on a true story. It's a work of fiction that might draw inspiration from various sources but doesn't have a real-life basis. The plot and characters are invented for entertainment purposes.
It depends on your beliefs. Some people take it as a literal and true account, while others view it more symbolically or allegorically.
It depends on how you define 'true story'. Some elements of 'After the Flood' are based on real incidents, but there might be fictionalized parts for dramatic effect.
No, it's not. 'Heaven and Earth' is usually a fictional work created by the author's imagination.
Pillars of the Earth is not a true story. It's a work of fiction created by the author's imagination. However, it might draw inspiration from historical events and settings to add authenticity.
In most cases, 'Salt of the Earth' is not a true story. It could be inspired by real events or themes but is not an accurate account of actual happenings. The creators might have taken creative liberties to make it more engaging or thought-provoking.