Can a story exist without characters?

In theory, a novel could be without people. It might concentrate on describing a phenomenon, a place, or a series of abstract ideas. But it's quite rare and unconventional.

Yes, it can. Some stories are told through the actions and dialogues of the characters alone, without a specific narrator guiding the reader/viewer.

In most cases, a story needs conflict. Without it, there's no growth for the characters, no obstacles to overcome, and no reason for the reader to keep turning the pages. Conflict is what makes a story engaging and meaningful.

Yes, it can. Some blogs are more like collections of thoughts, random musings, or just sharing information without a coherent story.

No way. A story without conflict would be pretty boring and lack any kind of tension or progression.

Sure it can. Some experimental or avant-garde stories might focus more on a concept or a group rather than a single protagonist.

I don't think a story can truly exist without a plot. A plot is what makes a story coherent and engaging. Without it, it's hard to have a meaningful and satisfying story experience.

I don't think so. A person's back story is what makes them unique. It includes all the things they've been through, like their education, first love, first job. All these elements are part of their back story, and without it, a person would be like an empty shell. Everyone has a story to tell, whether they choose to share it or not.

Yes, it's possible. Some characters in literature or real life might not have a detailed back story presented, but they can still have an impact or play a role.

Yes, love can definitely exist without sex. Love is a complex emotion that encompasses deep affection, care, respect, and understanding for another person. There are many forms of love, such as platonic love between friends or the love within a family. These relationships are based on non - sexual aspects like shared values, common interests, and mutual support.