webnovel

Is the official history credible?

2024-12-19 22:20
1 answer

The credibility of official history was relatively high. Official history was an official history book compiled and published by the imperial court. It had high authority and credibility. The official history was relatively well preserved and complete. The court rarely interfered with the historical facts recorded by historians, so it was more credible. The source of official history was often first-hand information, while the information of unofficial history had been passed on many times, and its original appearance could no longer be verified. It was difficult to distinguish between authenticity and falsehood. Although there might be some changes and modifications in the official history, the overall framework and major events would not deviate too much. Unofficial history often did not respect historical materials. It might add oil to the fire and make it difficult to determine its credibility. Therefore, although there might be some problems with the official history, the credibility of the official history was relatively high.

Is a novel based on official history considered official history?

1 answer
2024-09-12 02:50

Usually, the author who adapted the official history into a novel was a man-made author. Therefore, whether the novel was called "official history" depended on the reader's evaluation and recognition of the novel. Some people may think that the novel is similar to official history and call it "official history", while others think that the novel is different from official history or does not conform to historical facts, so they call it "unofficial history". However, in some cases, the author may deliberately ignore certain details or plots or reinterpret or arrange historical events, thus causing readers to doubt the authenticity of the novel. In this case, the author needs to clearly explain the authenticity and accuracy of the novel to the reader or it will be regarded as a fictional novel. Therefore, it was up to the reader's opinion and judgment whether or not to regard the adaptation of official history into a novel as "official history".

The Concept of Official History

1 answer
2024-09-13 03:45

Official history was an official book that recorded historical events, people, culture, geography, and other information. It was usually written by the government or academic institutions of the past dynasties with authority and seriousness. The purpose of official history was to record history objectively and truthfully to provide historical knowledge and cultural inheritance for future generations. In China, official history was usually divided into Xia, Shang, Zhou, Qin, Han, Tang, Song, Yuan, Ming, Qing, and other periods to record the historical events and figures of different dynasties. In foreign countries, official history was also known as official history. It was a book that officially recorded the history of a certain period or region written by government agencies or academic institutions.

Is oral legend credible or historical works credible?

1 answer
2024-09-18 18:44

Both oral legends and historical works have their own credibility and credibility, which depends on many factors such as historical background, credibility, the author's background and knowledge level, etc. The oral legends were usually passed down by word of mouth, and had undergone the test of time and constant modification and change in the process of word of mouth, so they could better reflect the cultural and social environment of the time. These oral legends may lack the accuracy and authority of historical works, but they can provide a more vivid and intuitive historical experience. Historical works were usually compiled by historians through studying historical events, people, culture, and other materials. They were highly accurate and authoritative. However, historical works could also be influenced by the author's background, era, political environment, and other factors, resulting in certain deviation and misunderstanding. Therefore, oral legends and historical works are important historical materials. We should obtain and understand history through various ways to understand history more comprehensively, objectively and accurately.

Ancient Chinese history was divided into official history, non-official history, miscellaneous history and unofficial history. How to view it?

1 answer
2024-09-17 19:17

There were indeed different versions and classifications of ancient Chinese history, such as official history, alternative history, miscellaneous history, and unofficial history. Official history books were written by the government, recording the views of the government and the decisions of the imperial court, which were important references for historical research. Bie shi was written by private history books, recording the views and opinions of different sects and interest groups, which were often political. Unofficial history, on the other hand, was a history book that had no official records and was privately written. The content of the book was often more realistic, but it was also limited by historical conditions, making it difficult to draw a comprehensive and accurate conclusion. From an academic point of view, official history, alternative history, miscellaneous history, and unofficial history are all important materials for historical research, but their value and accuracy will be evaluated according to different research methods and standards. In historical research, official history, as an official work, has high historical and cultural value, but it also needs to be comprehensively analyzed and compared with other materials to draw a comprehensive and accurate conclusion. Unofficial history, as a history book without official records, might be more authentic, but it also needed to be treated with caution to avoid being influenced by subjective assumptions. In short, official history, alternative history, miscellaneous history and unofficial history were all important components of ancient Chinese history. They were of great significance to the understanding and study of ancient Chinese history. In the study of history, we need to use a variety of materials such as official history, alternative history, miscellaneous history, and unofficial history to analyze and compare them in order to draw a comprehensive and accurate conclusion.

Is the secret history of Yongzheng a novel or an official history?

1 answer
2024-09-18 05:07

The Secret History of Yongzheng is a novel and not an official history. Yongzheng was an emperor of the Qing Dynasty, and his secret history was written into a novel about how he won the political struggle and established his own dynasty. Although this novel had a certain historical background and fictional elements, it was not an official history but a literary work.

Is The Secret History of Emperor Xiaozhuang an official history?

1 answer
2024-09-17 03:56

" The Secret History of Xiaozhuang " was not an official history book. It was an ancient novel and not an official history book. Although it is called a novel, it contains some historical events and characters, so it can be regarded as a historical novel. Although it had a great influence, it was not an official history book and could not be regarded as a history textbook.

Do you think the Chinese history in the history books is credible? Wouldn't it be rewritten by the later emperor?

1 answer
2024-09-17 11:23

Is the Chinese history in the history books credible? There were many aspects to consider. History books were a way of recording history, showing the development of Chinese history by recording the rulers and events of the past dynasties. The authenticity of history books could be verified in many ways. We can learn the truth and details of historical events by reading history books. We can also look up other reliable historical information to verify the accuracy of the history books. However, history books could also be rewritten by later emperors. This was because in Chinese history, the rulers of each generation would modify history to maintain their status and authority. For example, in Chinese history, after Qin Shihuang unified the six countries, he made a large-scale revision of history to hide his achievements and great achievements. This kind of revision of history might lead to inaccuracy in the history books. However, the authenticity of history books does not entirely depend on our own judgment. Because history books were written by the rulers of the past dynasties and have undergone a lot of revision, we can understand the authenticity of history by reading history books, but we can't judge the authenticity of history by reading a book.

In addition to the official history of the novel

1 answer
2024-12-20 01:27

The novel was called official history because it changed between the concept of history and the concept of literature. In ancient China, novels were regarded as a form of literature outside of official history, used to supplement the trivialities and details that were missing in official history. The difference between novels and official history was that official history recorded military affairs, while novels recorded things that were not recorded in official history. Although novels had always been in an awkward and inferior position, they played an important role in the Chinese cultural system. The novel not only had the secular nature of a novel about the world, but it also had knowledge, including rich local knowledge. In general, novels had their own unique value and special status as official history.

In addition to the official history of the novel

1 answer
2024-10-24 09:02

The novel was called official history because it changed between the concept of history and the concept of literature. In ancient China, novels were regarded as a form of literature outside of official history, used to supplement the trivialities and details that were missing in official history. The official history recorded the major events of the country, while the novel recorded some things that were not recorded in the official history. The novel played an important role in the Chinese cultural system. Not only did it have the secular nature of a novel about the world, but it also had knowledge and contained rich local knowledge. In general, novels had their own unique value and special status as official history.

The official history or novel of Warcraft

1 answer
2024-09-05 13:50

The official history of Warcraft was first released in 2004 by Blizzard Entertainment. In the game, players could choose different races and professions to participate in the battles and competitions in the game. The official history of Warcraft contains several versions of the game, the most famous of which is World of Warcraft, which was released in November 2004 and continued to be updated in the following years. In addition to the game version, the official history of Warcraft also contains many novels and comics, which tell different stories, covering the various races and classes in the game. The more famous novels included the Dark Souls series, the Song of Ice and Fire series, and the World of Warcraft series.

a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z