iQiyi's "Celebrating the Years" advanced broadcast case first trial judgment results came out. According to the court's ruling, iQiyi launched a "pay-to-view" service during the broadcast of "Celebrating Years," which damaged the rights of Gold VIP members to watch the drama in advance and reduced the members 'experience and satisfaction. The court found that some of iQiyi's contract terms were invalid and required iQiyi to provide the original gold VIP membership rights and interests to the plaintiff for 15 consecutive days, as well as compensate the plaintiff for the loss of 1500 yuan in notary fees. The verdict attracted widespread attention.
The results of the first trial of iQiyi's "Celebrating Years" had been released. The Beijing Internet Court found that iQiyi's "pay-to-view" behavior had damaged the rights of Gold VIP members to watch the drama and reduced their experience and satisfaction. The court ruled that some of iQiyi's contract terms were invalid and required the company to provide the original gold VIP membership rights to the plaintiff for 15 consecutive days and compensate the plaintiff for the loss of 1500 yuan in notaries. In addition, the court also rejected the plaintiffs 'other claims. This case triggered a discussion about the "advanced on-demand" model. The court believed that the development of the business model should follow the commercial terms and respect the user's feelings, and did not violate the relevant laws and regulations. iQiyi's one-sided addition of the "pay-per-view" clause was deemed to have harmed the rights and interests of users, and the effect of the contract was not changed.
The result of the judgment of iQiyi's "Celebrating Years" advanced broadcast case was that the court confirmed that part of iQiyi's "iQiyi VIP Member Service Agreement" was invalid, and determined that the "paid advanced broadcast" clause updated after Wu purchased the membership service did not have any effect on Wu. The court held that iQiyi's actions had damaged the rights of Gold VIP members to watch the drama and reduced the entertainment and satisfaction of the movie-watching experience. Therefore, the court ruled that iQiyi Company would provide Mr. Wu with 15 consecutive days of gold VIP membership rights and compensate Mr. Wu for the loss of 1500 yuan in notary fees. This ruling was aimed at protecting the legitimate rights and interests of users and regulating business model innovation.
The results of the first trial of iQiyi's "Celebrating Years" had been released. The Beijing Internet Court found that iQiyi's "pay-to-view" behavior had damaged the rights of Gold VIP members to watch the drama and reduced their experience and satisfaction. The court ruled that some of iQiyi's contract terms were invalid and required the company to provide the original gold VIP membership rights to the plaintiff for 15 consecutive days and compensate the plaintiff for the loss of 1500 yuan in notaries. This ruling meant that iQiyi needed to change its pay-to-view method to protect the rights of its members.
During the broadcast of the TV series "Celebrating Years," iQiyi launched a "paid advance on-demand" service, which was considered to have violated the rights of Gold VIP members. As a Gold VIP member, Mr. Wu felt that this payment model violated his legal rights, so he sued iQiyi in court. The Beijing Internet Court ruled in the first instance that iQiyi's "iQiyi VIP Member Service Agreement" was partially invalid, and the "paid advance on-demand" clause that was updated after Wu purchased the membership service did not have any effect on Wu. The court asked iQiyi to provide Wu with the original gold VIP membership rights and compensate Wu for the loss of 1500 yuan in notary fees. The verdict was upheld by Beijing Fourth Intermediate People's Court. In general, iQiyi's "advanced on-demand" behavior was deemed illegal and the affected members needed to be compensated.
iQiyi launched a "pay-per-view" service during the broadcast of "Celebrating Years", which was considered to have violated the rights of Gold VIP members. The Beijing Internet Court conducted a first-instance trial of the case and declared that iQiyi's iQiyi VIP Member Service Agreement was partially invalid. The court found that "advanced on-demand" should not damage the existing rights and interests of the members, and requested iQiyi to provide the rights and interests of the gold VIP members to the plaintiff for 15 consecutive days, and compensate the plaintiff for the loss of 1500 yuan in notaries. This judgment showed that the court believed that iQiyi's behavior harmed the rights and interests of users, while users believed that this model violated the contract. iQiyi said that it would continue to improve its products and services to provide a better movie-watching experience.
During the broadcast of the TV series "Celebrating Years," iQiyi launched a "paid advance on-demand" service. This move was considered to have damaged the rights of Gold VIP members to watch the drama and reduced their viewing experience and satisfaction. The Beijing Internet Court confirmed in the first-instance judgment that some of the contract terms of iQiyi were invalid, and requested iQiyi to provide the original membership rights and interests to the plaintiff, and compensate the loss of 1500 yuan in the notary fee. This ruling affirmed that the "pay-to-view" model should not harm the existing rights and interests of members, and emphasized that the healthy development of the business model should follow the commercial terms and respect the feelings of users. In short, iQiyi's "pay-per-view" behavior was deemed to have damaged the rights of the Golden VIP members.
During the broadcast of the TV series "Celebrating Years," iQiyi launched a "paid advance on-demand" service. This move was considered to have damaged the rights of Gold VIP members to watch the drama and reduced their viewing experience and satisfaction. The Beijing Internet Court confirmed in the first-instance judgment that some of the contract terms of iQiyi were invalid, and requested iQiyi to provide the original membership rights and interests to the plaintiff, and compensate the loss of 1500 yuan in the notary fee. Therefore, the judgment of iQiyi's "Celebrating the Years" advanced on-demand case was that some of the contract terms of iQiyi were invalid, and the original membership rights and interests had to be provided to the plaintiff, and the loss of 1500 yuan in notary fees had to be compensated.
The court ruled that iQiyi's "iQiyi VIP Member Service Agreement" was partially invalid, and that iQiyi's "paid advanced on-demand" service had damaged the rights and interests of gold VIP members. According to the judgment, iQiyi Company needed to provide the gold VIP membership rights to the plaintiff for 15 consecutive days and compensate the plaintiff for the loss of 1500 yuan in the notary fee. The court held that although iQiyi, as an online service platform, could change the terms of the contract, it should not harm the rights and interests of users. Therefore, the "pay-to-view" clause added by iQiyi Company did not have any effect on the Plaintiff. This ruling was considered to be a ruling to protect the rights and interests of consumers.
The Beijing Internet Court handed down a first-instance judgment on the case of iQiyi's "Celebrating Years". The court found that iQiyi's "pay-to-view" behavior had damaged the rights of Gold VIP members to watch the drama in advance, reducing the members 'experience and satisfaction of watching the movie. Although iQiyi could change the terms of the contract according to the characteristics of the network service, it should not harm the rights and interests of users. Therefore, the court ruled that iQiyi Company would provide the gold VIP membership rights to the plaintiff for 15 consecutive days and compensate the plaintiff for the loss of 1500 yuan in notaries. iQiyi expressed that it reserved the right to appeal the judgment. In short, the court found that iQiyi's advance on-demand behavior constituted a breach of contract and damaged the rights and interests of its members.
iQiyi launched a "pay-to-view" service during the broadcast of the TV series "Celebrating Years", which was considered to have damaged the rights of Gold VIP members to watch the drama in advance and reduced their experience and satisfaction. The Beijing Internet Court's first-instance judgment confirmed that iQiyi's "iQiyi VIP Member Service Agreement" was partially invalid, and determined that the "pay-to-play" clause added by iQiyi was not effective for users. The court ordered iQiyi to provide the original gold VIP membership rights and interests to the plaintiff for 15 consecutive days and compensate the plaintiff for the loss of 1500 yuan in notary fees. This judgment determined that iQiyi's behavior harmed the rights and interests of users.
iQiyi launched a "pay-to-view" service during the broadcast of the TV series "Celebrating Years", which was considered to have damaged the rights of Gold VIP members to watch the drama in advance and reduced their experience and satisfaction. The Beijing Internet Court conducted a first-instance trial of the case and ruled that iQiyi's iQiyi VIP Member Service Agreement was partially invalid. The court ruled that iQiyi Company had to provide the original gold VIP membership rights and interests to the plaintiff for 15 consecutive days and compensate the plaintiff for the loss of 1500 yuan in notary fees. This judgment showed that iQiyi's "pay-per-view" behavior was deemed a breach of contract and damaged the rights and interests of users.