The objective questions in a documentary were equivalent to the must-answer questions in a dubbed film. There was a cross-relationship between the documentary and the objective questions, and there was also a cross-relationship between the dubbing questions and the objective questions. Therefore, the objective questions in a documentary were equivalent to the questions that must be answered in a dubbed film.
An objective question was a question that required the answerer to provide objective facts or data. It did not involve subjective judgment or value judgment. For example,"Why does Lin Chong like his wife who is highly skilled in martial arts in the novel Water Margins?"
An objective question is a question that requires the reader to provide actual evidence or information so that the author or the author's agent can analyze and judge it. For example,"Who is Albert Einstein?" Or "Who is the main character in Journey to the West?" Subjective questions were questions that required the author or the author's agent to make a subjective judgment. This type of question usually requires the reader to provide their own opinions or thoughts and support or refute the author's point of view. For example,"I think the main character in Journey to the West is Sun Wukong. What about you?" Or "Do you disagree with the author's view that Sun Wukong is the main character in Journey to the West?"
Multiple-choice questions are often viewed as subjective because they require the reader or audience to make their own judgments and choices. In the field of online literature, there would usually be a series of multiple-choice questions for readers or viewers to choose based on the plot, characters, theme, and other factors. The answers to these choices may be influenced by the author or editor, so it is up to the reader or audience to make their own judgment and choice.
Fill-in-the-blanks questions were subjective questions. The fill-in-the-blank questions in the director's exam usually required the examinee to reason and make a reasonable explanation based on the existing information and common sense. Therefore, the director's fill-in-the-blank question required the examinee to have a strong subjective consciousness and reasoning ability, as well as the ability to analyze and process existing information.
Subjective questions were questions that required the author's own perspective and standpoint, such as an evaluation of an event or character, an interpretation of a literary work, etc. The objective questions referred to questions that required objective facts and data, such as the geographical features of a certain area, the quality evaluation of a certain product, and so on. The techniques to solve the subjective and objective questions were as follows: 1. Reading materials: Before solving subjective and objective questions, you need to read the questions carefully and understand the questions. The questions require a clear answer direction. 2. Confirm your point of view: After reading the material, you need to confirm your personal point of view and position to form a clear answer. 3. Organizing the answer: After confirming your point of view, you need to organize your point of view into a complete answer. Pay attention to the use of appropriate words and language. 4. Details: After organizing the answer, you need to fill in the details of the answer, including facts, data, and citations to make the answer more accurate. 5. Revise repeatedly: After completing the answer, you need to revise and improve it repeatedly to ensure that the answer is accurate, complete, and concise.
The explanation of terms in the teacher recruitment examination was usually an objective question. An objective question was a question that required the examinee to judge, analyze, summarize, and summarize based on existing relevant knowledge, concepts, principles, and other content. It did not require the examinee to give an answer directly based on their subjective initiative. In the teacher recruitment exam, objective questions usually included explanations of terms, concepts, principles, and so on.
Objective fiction is a type of fictional work that presents events, characters, and situations in a relatively unbiased way. It aims to show things as they are within the fictional world without overly influencing the reader's perception through the author's subjective opinions. For example, in a detective objective fiction, the author might simply present the clues and the actions of the characters without constantly telling the reader how to feel about each character.
In some cases, they can. It depends on the creator's intent and the nature of the story.
Dali Shaoqing was equivalent to the vice president of the Supreme Court of China.
In literature, 'The Little Prince' can be seen as an objective good story. It has beautiful themes about friendship, love and seeing the true essence of things. It teaches valuable lessons in a simple and engaging way. In contrast, some horror stories that focus solely on gore and violence without any deeper meaning can be considered objective bad stories. They just shock the reader without offering anything positive.