Are Qing Yuannian and his son-in-law the same screenwriter?

Qing Yuannian and his son-in-law were not the same director. Celebration years by Sun Hao directed, and the son-in-law by Deng Ke directed.

No, it wasn't. 'Celebrating the Years' and 'Departed Son-in-law' were not directed by the same director. "Celebrating Years" was directed by Sun Hao, while "Duobai Son-in-law" was directed by Deng Ke.

It was not the same director. Celebration years by Sun Hao directed, and the son-in-law by Deng Ke directed.

In " Celebrating Years," the Qing Emperor knew from the beginning that Fan Xian was his son. Even though the Qing Emperor did not publicly acknowledge Fan Xian's identity, he already knew Fan Xian's identity when he was born. He had shown him love and indulgence. The Qing Emperor's feelings for Fan Xian were complicated. He had helped Fan Xian and often schemed against him. He had even thought of killing him. After Fan Xian entered the capital, the Qing Emperor secretly helped him and arranged for Fan Xian to go to the Qing Temple to fulfill his wish as a father. Thus, in " Celebrating Years," the Qing Emperor had always known that Fan Xian was his son.

In " Celebrating Years," the Qing Emperor knew from the beginning that Fan Xian was his son. Even though the Qing Emperor did not publicly acknowledge Fan Xian's identity, he already knew Fan Xian's identity when he was born. He had shown him love and indulgence. The Qing Emperor's feelings for Fan Xian were complicated. He had helped Fan Xian and often schemed against him. He had even thought of killing him.

There were a few novels of the same level as Celebrating Years. Among them, there were the Spy Guest, General Night, Nirvana in Fire Board, and Battle Through the Heavens. These works were all novels written by Maoni, and they were all adapted into TV series. They were similar to Celebrating Years in terms of plot and cultural background, and they were both loved by the audience. Other than these works, there was no more specific information about other works of the same level.

Yes, Qing Yunian was the Qing Emperor's son. The Qing Emperor had wanted to kill Fan Xian when he was born, but Fan Jian had used his own son to replace Fan Xian, allowing him to survive. The Qing Emperor had always known that Fan Xian was his son, but the two had never had any father-son relationship. They had even used their son as a chess piece. In the end, the Qing Emperor was assassinated by Fan Xian. Fan Xian chose to live in seclusion and did not become the Emperor.

Yes, Qing Yunian was the Qing Emperor's son. The Qing Emperor had wanted to kill Fan Xian when he was born, but Fan Jian had used his own son to replace Fan Xian, allowing him to survive. The Qing Emperor had always known that Fan Xian was his son, but the two had never had any father-son relationship. They had even used their son as a chess piece. In the end, the Qing Emperor was assassinated by Fan Xian. Fan Xian chose to live in seclusion and did not become the Emperor.

Yes, Qing Yunian was the Qing Emperor's son. Fan Xian was the Qing Emperor's biological son, but he did not become Emperor. Fan Xian chose to live in seclusion, and the throne was inherited by the Qing Emperor's Third Prince. Fan Xian had killed his father to avenge his mother. He had no interest in the throne and was more willing to be a subject than an emperor.

Qing Yunian was the Qing Emperor's son. The Qing Emperor had always known that Fan Xian was his son, but the two had never had any father-son relationship. They had even used their son as a chess piece. The reason Fan Xian killed his father, the Qing Emperor, was because the Qing Emperor had killed Fan Xian's mother, Ye Qingmei. In order to avenge his mother, Fan Xian decided to personally carry it out. The Qing Emperor's love for Fan Xian began with father and son and continued throughout. However, the Qing Emperor viewed power as more important than kinship, so he adopted a cold attitude toward Fan Xian. Therefore, Qing Yuannian was the Qing Emperor's son.