Luo Xiang being besieged is the sorrow of the times

After Professor Luo Xiang raised his opinion on the unreasonable restrictions on the children of criminals, he was fiercely criticized and attacked by netizens. His point of view sparked different opinions and controversy, but if the discussion went beyond the discussion of the rule of law itself and deviated from the rational way, leaving only attacks and accusations, that would be the sorrow of our era. Luo Xiang believed that the basis of punishment should be based on retribution, supplemented by utility. Only when a person committed a crime could punishment be imposed. However, his proposal to abolish the political review system also led to a siege, involving multiple factors such as different views, unequal information, and class opposition. In general, different opinions and suggestions should be discussed and debated on an open and transparent platform in order to find a more reasonable and scientific solution.

Luo Xiang was born in Leiyang, Hunan Province, an ordinary small county.

Luo Xiang had been interviewed many times recently, including an interview with the Beijing City Culture and Entertainment Law Society and a conversation with Yu Hua, the author of Brothers. In the interview, Luo Xiang shared his views on modern society and human nature. He believed that there was no limit to the darkness of human nature, and that the evil of human nature must be restrained by the rule of law. In addition, he also talked about the development of entertainment law and the regulation of the entertainment industry. Luo Xiang also mentioned his concerns about his influence, as well as his thoughts about choice and fate. Overall, Luo Xiang showed his humility and concern for social issues in the interview.

The specific content of Luo Xiang's warning could not be learned from the search results provided. The search results included different topics and events related to Luo Xiang, but did not provide information about the specific warnings he issued. Therefore, he could not provide an accurate answer to Luo Xiang's warning.

Luo Xiang received some negative comments and accusations, but the specific situation did not provide enough information to understand why he was beaten. We can see some comments and events about Luo Xiang, but there is no clear explanation of the specific circumstances in which he was hammered. Therefore, based on the information provided, I am unable to give a specific answer regarding Luo Xiang's death.

It was normal for Luo Xiang to be misunderstood. His words and opinions were often misunderstood or cursed by others. He put forward his own views in his discussion on morality, but he was misunderstood and criticized. He was also accused of being "crooked" and "pro-American." This misunderstanding did not only happen to Luo Xiang, but also to other public figures, such as the poet Yu Xiuhua. This kind of misunderstanding was especially serious in the Internet environment. It was easy to erase all of a person's contributions. It was not uncommon for Luo Xiang to be misunderstood. It was a common phenomenon.

Luo Xiang was detained on suspicion of multiple crimes. In 2019, he and his family were taken to criminal measures on suspicion of causing trouble. The court found Huang Deyi and other 18 people guilty of causing trouble and made the corresponding judgment. Huang Deyi and the others built the pontoon bridge to collect the bridge fee. They were determined to have forcefully taken other people's property, causing a bad social impact. The circumstances were serious. According to the criminal law, the act of raising animals to cause harm to people may also constitute a crime. The specific judgment result needs to be judged according to the specific circumstances of the case and the degree of fault of the dog owner. According to relevant reports, Luo Xiang had answered the question of whether a dog biting people constituted a crime. According to the General Principles of Civil Law and the Tort Law, if the animal caused damage to others, the owner had to bear the responsibility for compensation. The maximum sentence for causing serious injury to another person is three years. In short, Luo Xiang was detained because he was suspected of multiple crimes. The specific verdict needed to be determined according to the specific circumstances of the case.

Luo Xiang's works include Circle Justice and The Details of the Rule of Law. Circle Justice is an essay on legal culture published by China Law Press in August 2019. This book explored the concept and reality of law, justice, and morality, and analyzed social hot cases. At the same time, it shared the author's academic experience and thoughts on life. " Details of the Rule of Law " was a collection of legal essays aimed at the general public. From the interpretation of hot cases, the popular science of legal concepts, the explanation of classic classics, and other aspects, it popularized legal knowledge and the concept of the rule of law. The book was first published in November 2021. In addition, Luo Xiang also recommended a series of other books, such as Confessions, Sin and Punishment, and The Brothers Karamazov.

Luo Xiang pointed out that breaking the law and committing a crime were two different concepts. He used the examples of running red lights and students not studying hard to illustrate this point. He believed that everyone could break the law, such as running a red light, but it was not the same as committing a crime. He also emphasized the principle of a legal crime in criminal law, that is, the provisions of criminal law must be clear and not vague. However, the search results provided did not mention whether Luo Xiang himself had violated the law, so it was impossible to conclude whether he had violated the law.

Luo Xiang was a well-known criminal law scholar and internet celebrity. Luo Xiang's views on the abolition of the death penalty had changed. In the past, he supported the abolition of the death penalty, but later changed his position and believed that the death penalty system should be retained. He believed that the existence of the death penalty could maintain fairness and justice and punish the value of crime. However, it was not clear whether he supported the death penalty forever. In general, Luo Xiang's views were against the abolition of the death penalty.