May I ask, if I use someone else's song to fill in the lyrics, is it considered an act of copyright violation? Was there a copyright issue?

Changing someone else's song involves copyright issues. If you change, edit, or perform someone else's music without authorization, it may constitute copyright violation. In music copyright law, the copyright of a musical work is usually protected by the composer or copyright owner. Without their authorization, no one can change, edit, or perform the musical work. Changing someone else's song may involve violating the copyright of the composer or copyright owner, so you need their explicit permission to do so. Although you can try to modify other people's songs, you need to be aware that this may involve copyright disputes and legal issues, and may lead to legal responsibility. Therefore, it was best to understand the relevant legal provisions and obtain authorization or consult a professional lawyer before changing someone else's song.

Using the cultivation technique settings in other people's novels without the author's authorization and without appropriate adaptation may constitute copyright violation. According to the copyright law, the author enjoyed the copyright of his work, including the property rights of his creativity and ideas. If you use the cultivation technique settings in other people's works without the author's authorization, it may constitute an act of copyright violation. In order to avoid copyright violation, creators should respect the rights of the author and avoid using the content of other people's works without the author's authorization. In addition, the creator should also make appropriate adjustments to the work to make it conform to his own creative intent and avoid violating the legal rights of others. If you want to use the martial art settings in other people's novels, it is recommended to contact the author first and obtain authorization.

If there is a legal connection between the modified work and the original work, using the music of the original work may constitute copyright violation. For example, if the modified work is a storyline or scene of the original work, or if the modified work is a character or image of the original work, then the use of the music of the original work may constitute copyright. However, the specific situation still needed to consider the copyright status of the music and whether the act of modifying the work was legal. If the act of modifying the work is legal and does not violate the copyright of the music, then the use of the music may not be considered copyright violation. However, if the act of modifying the work is illegal or violates the copyright of the music, then the use of the music may constitute copyright violation. Therefore, it is recommended to abide by the relevant laws and regulations when using music to avoid copyright violation.

Even if you don't get any benefits from publishing the content of someone else's novel, it may still be a violation of copyright. This was because in many countries, copyright laws protected the copyright of literary works created by authors, including the content of novels. Unauthorized publication, copying, distribution, or adaptation of the content of another person's work may constitute copyright. Although there was no economic benefit that could be a sufficient condition for the violation, the benefit might not necessarily be a necessary condition for the violation. If the content published does not violate the copyright of others, it may still constitute copyright violation. In addition, if the published content involves the intellectual property of others such as trademark, patent or other intellectual property rights, it may constitute an copyright violation even if there is no benefit. Therefore, if you publish the content of someone else's novel, please make sure that it does not violate the copyright of others to avoid possible legal risks.

If copying someone else's work does not conform to the principle of creativity, it may constitute an copyright violation. The principle of creativity meant that only when the author independently created a brand new work could it be considered as an copyright violation. When copying someone else's work, if you only copy the elements in the work or simply imitate the style, structure, language, etc. of the work without creating a new work, then this behavior may not constitute copyright violation. However, if the main body, plot, character, and other aspects of the copied work have undergone major changes, causing the work to be fundamentally different from the original, then it may constitute an intellectual property right. Therefore, when copying other people's works, one had to be careful to avoid violating other people's intellectual property rights. If you are not sure whether it is an infringement, you should consult a legal professional.

Continuing someone else's novel is usually an act of copyright violation because continuing someone else's novel violates the copyright of the original author. A copyright was a right that included the ownership of the creativity, creativity, and form of expression of a work. If anyone continues to write, adapt, or translate the original novel without the authorization of the original author, it will constitute an act of copyright. This behavior may bring financial losses to the original author because they may not be able to obtain copyright protection for the work. In addition, the act of writing a continuation may also destroy the uniqueness and integrity of the original novel because the content of the continuation may be completely different from the original novel or contain a large number of unauthorized modifications and alterations. Therefore, if you want to continue writing someone else's novel, it's best to get the original author's permission or indicate the source. This will ensure that your actions are legal and respect the rights of the original author.

Converting someone else's video content into an article without authorization may constitute copyright infringement. This was because using other people's video content to create an article was equivalent to modifying and creating within the scope of other people's intellectual property rights, which might violate other people's copyrights. In particular, if the converted video content was created by someone else without their permission, then using the content to create an article could constitute copyright infringement. In addition, if the converted video content contains content within the scope of other people's intellectual property rights, such as other people's trademark, logo, patent, etc., it may also lead to copyright violation. In order to avoid copyright, it is recommended to confirm whether you have obtained the authorization or copyright of the video content and comply with relevant laws and regulations when creating the article. If you are not sure whether it is an infringement, you can consult the relevant legal professionals or conduct a legal test to determine.

Using dialogue from someone else's novel to make a comic might involve copyright issues. Unauthorized use of dialogue content from another person's novel may be considered an act of copyright violation. Although manga was an art form that could change and modify the content of a novel to a certain extent, directly copying and stealing the dialogue content of a novel was still a kind of copyright violation. In copyright law, adaptation, translation, sorting, or processing of literary works required the permission of the original author, otherwise they might face the risk of copyright disputes. Therefore, if you want to use the dialogue in other people's novels to create comics, it is recommended to first obtain the authorization of the original author of the novel or consult the relevant laws and regulations to avoid unnecessary legal risks.

Generally speaking, using someone else's book title to write a book was considered an copyright violation. It depended on whether the title was legally authorized or whether the legal trademark was used. If the title, author's name, and publishing house of the book were all from someone else's work and were not authorized by the author or copyright owner, then using these elements to create a book might be regarded as copyright violation. For example, if someone took someone without authorization, then this behavior may constitute copyright violation. In addition, if someone used a certain trademark on the cover of a book or used a certain in the name of a book, this behavior could also be considered as copyright violation. Therefore, if you need to use other people's titles or other elements when writing a novel, it's best to confirm whether these elements have obtained legal authorization or trademark rights to avoid possible legal risks.

Having the same name as someone else doesn't necessarily constitute an copyright violation. 1. Whether the name is in the public domain, such as the name of a country, a place, an organization, etc.; 2. Whether the name is original or whether it has used the work of others without permission; 3. Whether the name is deliberately plagiarized without permission; 4. Whether the name is deliberately imitating the work of others without permission; 5. Whether the name is a malicious imitation of someone else's work without permission. According to China's " copyright law ", only original names could be considered as an copyright violation, while names that were reasonably used could not be considered as a copyright violation. Therefore, if the name is not an original name, but the first use of another person's work without permission, it will constitute an copyright violation. It should be noted that in the case of dealing with the same name, other relevant factors such as whether it is misleading, whether it is easy to be confused, and other comprehensive judgments must be considered to determine whether it is a violation.