The novel reading in the college entrance examination is more difficult than the practical reading

Why was it that the literature category was always more difficult than the practical category? Then what was the point of setting the questions like this? Most of the answers to biographies could be found in the original text. For example, the 2012 college entrance examination questions, literature reading, Lao She's Mr. Breeches…Some people thought that the author also had human weaknesses... If I agree, first of all, I'll let this kind of behavior go. Many people could answer that, but the second point was that I was too mean to Mr. Breeches. There weren't many answers... The third point is that I lack the spirit of reflection. This was even stranger. If it was from a negative perspective, the first point was that "I" was not the character in the article. Many people could answer this question. As for the second point, the words and deeds of " I " in the article were very few, and the personality traits were not obvious, so not many people could answer it…I even think the answer is wrong... Was there a necessary connection between a lack of obvious personality traits and a lack of human weakness? The third one was even less likely to be related. "I" mainly played the role of connecting the plot in the novel. This was strange to a certain extent…