In the debate competition, our side's topic is that there is real friendship on the Internet. I urgently need the opposing side's topic (there is no real friendship on the Internet).

The affirmative side could debate around the following points: Contribution and return are closely related: there is a close relationship between contribution and return. Only by giving first can you expect to get a return. Whether it was in work, study, or personal life, we all need to put in effort and sweat before we can reap results and rewards. Therefore, in the debate, it can be emphasized that effort and reward are related. Only by putting in enough effort can you get the corresponding reward. The returns are usually visible: the returns between effort and return are usually visible. When we put in effort, we usually see the corresponding results and gains. For example, when we put in enough effort in work or study, we usually get rewards such as improvement and harvest. Therefore, it can be emphasized in the debate that the reward is usually visible, and only by putting in enough effort can you see the corresponding reward. 3. Contribution and return are proportional: Contribution and return are proportional. Our efforts and returns are usually proportional. Only by putting in enough effort can we get the corresponding returns. For example, when we put in enough effort at work, we usually get a higher position, better salary, and other rewards. Therefore, in the debate, it can be emphasized that effort and return are proportional. Only by putting in enough effort can you get the corresponding return. Success requires constant effort: the relationship between effort and return is constantly accumulating and sublimating. Only by constantly putting in effort could one continuously reap rewards. Success is not something that can be achieved overnight. It requires constant perseverance and hard work. Therefore, it can be emphasized in the debate that success requires constant effort. Only by putting in enough effort can you achieve continuous success. The above are some points that the positive side can revolve around. They can be freely developed and supplemented according to the specific situation and topic of the debate.

The credibility of information on the Internet was a very complicated problem because it involved the reliability of the source of the information, the accuracy of the information, the authenticity of the information, and many other aspects. Here is some information that might be useful to you: The reliability of information sources: There are many sources of information on the Internet, including search engines, news websites, social media, forums, and so on. However, the reliability of these sources is not necessarily the same because they may be affected by political, commercial, cultural and other factors. Therefore, when judging whether the information on the Internet was credible, the reliability of the information source needed to be considered. The accuracy of the information: There is a lot of information on the Internet, many of which are unverified or subjective. Therefore, the accuracy of the information on the Internet needed to be considered when judging whether it was credible. News, social media, and other time-sensitive information needed to be closely monitored to avoid being misled. The authenticity of the information: The information on the Internet may also contain false information. This information may have been deliberately fabricated, forged, or based on inaccurate sources. Therefore, the authenticity of the information on the Internet needed to be considered when judging whether it was credible or not. The value of information: Although the information on the Internet may contain false information and inaccurate information, if the content of the information is valuable, it can still have a positive impact on people. Therefore, the value of the information on the Internet needed to be considered when judging whether it was credible or not. This is some information that might be useful to you. Of course, the materials needed for the debate might include how to analyze the reliability and accuracy of online information, how to identify false information, how to evaluate the value of information, and so on. If you need more detailed help, I suggest you consult your debate instructor or coach.

It was a question worth exploring whether the internet language was beneficial to the development of literature. Internet language is the rise of the development of network technology. It is featured by concise, intuitive, easy to understand, and can quickly convey information. The application of network language in literature can make the works more vivid, vivid and fascinating, enhance the expressiveness and appeal of the works, and help readers better understand and feel the meaning of the works. However, we can't ignore some of the negative effects of online language. The use of online language often carried a strong sense of the times and commerce. The use of some online language may bring a certain degree of vulgar and commercial tendencies to the work. It was difficult to guarantee the accuracy and standard of the online language. Some online language might have grammar errors, inappropriate words, and other problems that might affect the quality of the work. Therefore, I believe that the use of online language in literature should be moderate and should pay attention to the norms and accuracy of the language. We should pay attention to the understanding and application of online language in the creative process to avoid negative effects on the work. At the same time, we should strengthen the standard management of network language and formulate corresponding standards and regulations to ensure the quality and accuracy of network language. In this way, the online language could better serve the development of literature and bring a better reading experience to readers.

College students participating in volunteer activities focused on training. On the contrary, it could be argued that college students participating in volunteer activities could not directly train their personal abilities, but might waste time and resources. Here are some possible counterarguments: 1. volunteer activities may affect college students 'studies. If college students participated in volunteer activities too frequently, it might take up their time and cause them to be unable to concentrate on their studies. Moreover, volunteer activities usually required a long time to participate in, which would have a certain negative impact on the health of college students. 2. volunteer activities do not provide practical work experience for college students. Although volunteer activities could cultivate college students 'sense of social responsibility and teamwork, these experiences could not be directly converted into professional experience. For most college students, their main goal was to find a job after graduation. Therefore, volunteer activities were not a necessary step in their career planning. 3. volunteer activities can't improve the academic performance of college students. Although volunteer activities can help students build a good sense of community and social responsibility, they can't directly improve students 'academic performance. Many college students participate in volunteer activities to find a better job after graduation rather than to enrich their studies. 4. The voluntary activities can't improve the professional skills of college students. Although volunteer activities can help students develop their leadership and teamwork skills, they cannot directly improve their professional skills. For many college students, they need to learn professional knowledge in school in order to find a better job after graduation. Therefore, volunteer activities were not a necessary step for them to improve their skills.

The development of the Internet has more advantages than disadvantages for literature. The slogan of the debate competition is as follows: 1. Make literature better: The development of the Internet creates a better environment for the development of literature, making literary works closer to readers and more colorful. 2. Online literature is also literature: the development of the Internet not only allows online literature to be more widely spread, but also improves the quality and level of literature, making literature more diverse and rich. 3. The development of the Internet has promoted literary innovation: The development of Internet technology has provided more opportunities and platforms for literary innovation, allowing literature to be closer to the needs of the times and readers. 4. Let literature go global: The development of the Internet makes it easier for literature to go global, attracting more readers and authors, expanding the influence and coverage of literature. The development of the Internet makes literature more convenient: The development of the Internet makes literature more convenient. The readers can read literary works anytime and anywhere, and it also provides more opportunities and platforms for literary writers to create.

The development of the Internet had more advantages than disadvantages for literature. 1. Online literature helps literary creation to promote the prosperity of literature. 2. Online development of literary peers. Online literature is a new window for literature, providing readers with a wider range of reading choices. 4. The development of the internet and the advancement of literature. 5. Make online literature a part of literature to bring readers a better reading experience. Online literature is the future of literature, injecting new impetus into the development of literature. 7. The development of literature on the Internet. 8. Online literature provides readers with a brand new literary experience, contributing to the literary cause. Online literature is an indispensable part of literature, injecting new vitality into literary development. 10. A win-win situation for the development of literature on the Internet.

As a positive, you can consider asking the following questions to question the negative: 1 What is "our youth is our own decision"? In this sentence, who should make this decision? What did this decision mean? If youth needs to make decisions, what should these decisions be like? Does it include immoral or inappropriate decisions? If a person can't make his own decision, then is there any meaning to his youth? Are there enough resources for everyone to make their own decisions? If so, where did these resources come from? If not, then why? Should a person be blamed or punished if he cannot make his own decisions? If so, was this accusation or punishment reasonable? 6. Do those who make their own decisions receive the respect and support they deserve? If so, why? If not, then why? Is there enough education and social training to help people make the right decisions? If so, where was the training conducted? If not, then why? If a person's youth is limited or deprived, does he still have the right to pursue his dreams and goals? If so, why? If not, then why? These questions can help you better understand the opposing side's point of view and arguments in order to better debate.

The conclusion of the opposing side of the online pros and cons debate: The advantages of the network: 1. Ease: The Internet makes information transmission faster and more convenient. People can obtain information from any part of the world in a few seconds. 2. Freedom: The Internet is a free space where people can freely express their thoughts and opinions on the Internet without restrictions. Sharing: The Internet allows people to share their knowledge and experience, making knowledge more universal and shared. 4. Creation: The Internet provides more opportunities for people to create and start businesses. People can achieve more innovation and inventions through the Internet. Weakness of the Internet: Fake: The authenticity and credibility of online information are questioned. Some information may be processed and processed to lack authenticity. 2. Misleading: Information on the Internet spreads very quickly. Some information may be mistransmitted and misinterpreted to mislead people's judgments and decisions. 3. Invasion of privacy: The spread of online information may invade people's privacy and expose people's personal information. 4. Addiction: Overuse of the Internet may cause people to be addicted to the online world and affect their physical and mental health. To sum up, the network has many advantages and disadvantages. When using the network, we need to rationally view its advantages and disadvantages, make full use of its advantages and avoid its disadvantages, so as to better use the network to bring more value to our society and individuals.

Network pros and cons As a modern communication tool, the Internet provided a convenient and fast way for people to communicate. The benefits of the internet included: 1. The Internet allows us to obtain information more easily. Through the network, we can access all kinds of information resources, including news, articles, videos, etc., anytime and anywhere. Moreover, these contents can be shared on various platforms, making the information more diverse and rich. The Internet can also help us learn and educate better. Through the internet, we can access various online courses, learning resources, library materials, etc., so that we can have a deeper understanding of various knowledge fields to improve our learning ability and level. The internet also provides us with more entertainment. Through the internet, we can access all kinds of videos, games, social media, etc. to enrich our entertainment life. However, there were also some negative effects of the Internet. The internet could also lead to the spread of false information. Through the internet, we can access all kinds of information, but this information may come from unreliable sources, which will cause us to receive wrong information and affect our judgment and decision-making. 2. The Internet could also lead to the leakage of personal privacy. Through the internet, we can easily access all kinds of sensitive personal information such as home address, phone number, etc., which may lead to the risk of personal information leakage. The internet could also lead to the spread of violence and hate speech. Through the internet, we can come into contact with all kinds of extreme speech and violence, which may have a negative impact on society. To sum up, the internet is a tool with both positive and negative effects. We need to use and manage the network correctly to maximize its advantages and avoid its negative effects.

During the debate, there might be questions about whether the advantages of the Internet outweighed the disadvantages or the disadvantages outweighed the advantages. This question depended on the viewpoint and stance of the party debating. Those who argue that the advantages of the internet outweigh the disadvantages may argue that the internet provides many conveniences and benefits. For example, the internet can make it easier for people to obtain information, communicate and shop, and can also increase productivity and creativity. The Internet could also promote innovation and development, bringing more opportunities and choices to people. In addition, the network could also protect privacy and information security to prevent information leakage and network attacks. On the contrary, those who argue that the disadvantages of the Internet are greater than the advantages may point out that the Internet also has many problems and dangers. For example, the spread of online rumors and false information will lead to social unrest and panic. Internet addiction and addiction will affect people's mental health and social ability. Internet attacks and security problems will affect the safety and stability of society. In addition, the Internet may also lead to regional discrimination and information imbalance because the information on the Internet is often one-sided and inaccurate. Therefore, the question of whether the advantages or disadvantages of the network outweighed the advantages or disadvantages in the debate needed to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the network according to the viewpoint and position of the debater, find out the relationship between the advantages and disadvantages, and try to convince the audience and judges through reasonable arguments and logical reasoning.