What are the objective behaviors of copyright violation?

The online copyright violation mainly includes the following forms: 1. Reproduction right: Without the permission of the copyright owner, no one may violate the online copyright by copying, distributing, displaying, performing, broadcasting, exhibition, translation, etc. 2. Right of Communication: Without the permission of the copyright owner, no one is allowed to violate the online copyright by means of information network transmission, sharing, display, performance, broadcast, exhibition, etc. 3. Right of adaptation: Without the permission of the copyright owner, no one is allowed to change the content, structure, and form of the online work or to copy, distribute, display, perform, broadcast, or exhibit the original work without indicating the author of the original work. 4. Right of translation: Without the permission of the copyright owner, no one is allowed to translate online works into other languages and transmit, share, display, perform, broadcast, exhibit, etc. to violate the online copyright. 5. Right of compilation: Without the permission of the copyright owner, no one is allowed to compile online works into a collection and violate the online copyright by means of transmission, sharing, display, performance, broadcast, exhibition, etc. through the Internet. 6. Right of exploitation: Without the permission of the copyright owner, no one is allowed to use online works in any way, including adaptation, translation, compilation, production of electronic games, movies, TV series, advertisements, etc., to violate the copyright of the network. These are the main forms of online copyright violation. Different types of online works may violate different types of rights of the copyright owner. Therefore, when using online works, you should pay attention to protecting the legitimate rights and interests of the copyright owner.

The behavior characteristics of online copyright violation mainly include the following aspects: 1. Without the permission of the copyright owner, the copyright owner may copy, distribute, perform, show, broadcast, or spread the copyright through the Internet. 2. Using the work for commercial purposes includes illegal profit, profit-making performances, exhibition, sales, rental, etc. 3. Distort, tamper with, deny the original intent of the work, or publicize or promote the work with false content. 4. Infringing the core rights of the copyright owner, such as the right of information network transmission, distribution, performance, screening, and broadcasting. 5. Create, spread, or provide false information to mislead or deceive the public, or maliciously slander, delete, or block other people's information. 6. Other acts that violate the legal rights and interests of the copyright owner. Because the behavior of online copyright violation is very diverse, the behavior of online copyright violation should be judged and identified according to the actual situation and be cracked down according to law.

The online copyright violation mainly includes the following forms: 1. Reproduction right: Any act of copying, distributing, performing, screening, broadcasting, or information network transmission of a work to the public without the permission of the copyright owner shall constitute an act of copyright violation. 2. Right of adaptation: Changing, adapting, translating, or combining the work to create a new work is an act of copyright. 3. Creation sharing right: Without the permission of the copyright owner, the act of sharing the copyright of a work by means of co-creation or co-creation also constituted an act of copyright violation. 4. Right of display: Any act of displaying, performing, broadcasting, recording, or video-recording a work in a public place or an unspecific place will constitute an act of copyright violation. 5. Broadcasting rights: The act of spreading or broadcasting a work through television, radio, and the Internet is an act of copyright. 6. Information network communication right: Without the permission of the copyright owner, the act of transmitting works through the Internet, mobile communication, and other information networks will constitute an invasion. It should be noted that the identification of online copyright violation requires a comprehensive consideration of various factors such as the type of work, quantity, scope of transmission, usage, etc. Therefore, there may be different judgment standards in practice.

According to the provisions of the "copyright law", the composition of an act of copyright violation includes the following: 1. Duplication: refers to the act of copying, distributing, renting, exhibiting, performing, showing, broadcasting, or spreading information on the Internet. 2. The act of adaptation: refers to the act of adapting, translating, and arranging the works of others to change the original content or expression of the works without changing the copyright enjoyed by the copyright owner. 3. Creation behavior: refers to the author's creative process of completing the work independently according to his own creative inspiration. 4. Piracy: refers to plagiarism, plagiarism of original content in other people's works, including text, pictures, audio, video, etc. 5. The act of exploiting the works of others: refers to the act of exploiting, adapting, or creating the original content of the works of others without the permission of the copyright owner. (6) The act of publicizing or exhibiting another person's work: refers to publicizing or exhibiting another person's work without the permission of the copyright owner, or communicating another person's work to the public in other ways. All of the above acts of copyright violation. In the event of an copyright violation, the copyright owner has the right to take legal action to protect his copyright rights.

It's a complex issue. In many cases, if the fan fiction doesn't harm the original creator's market or reputation and adds something new, it might not be a copyright violation. However, if it's too similar and used for profit without permission, it could be.

Plundering copyright usually constituted a crime of copyright violation. The copyrights of novels, movies, music, and other works belong to the creators. The creators have the right to enjoy the copyrights of their works and legally use their works by selling, renting, transferring, and so on. If you plagiarize someone else's copyright without authorization, it will be considered as a crime of copyright violation. In many countries, plagiarism is a crime and is punished by law. For example, plagiarism in the United States could be protected by federal copyright laws and face penalties such as fine and imprisonment. In the UK, plagiarism may result in criminal charges or civil responsibility, depending on the circumstances and evidence of plagiarism. Therefore, in order to protect the intellectual property rights of the creators and avoid the occurrence of copyright infringement, we should respect the original works and avoid plagiarism.

Plundering another person's work is usually seen as a violation of copyright. The copyright refers to the rights that the author has over his work, including property rights and personal rights. Among them, property rights included copyrights, trademark rights, patent rights, and trade secret rights. If you plagiarize or plagiarize someone else's work, even if you don't get the original author's explicit permission, it will still constitute an act of copyright violation. This kind of behavior would cause the original author's property rights to be violated, and it might also cause damage to his personal dignity. In literary works, plagiarism and plagiarism were more common acts of copyright violation because the creation of literary works was more difficult and often required a long time of accumulation and thinking. Therefore, everyone should respect the intellectual property rights of others and avoid plagiarism and plagiarism.

Doujinshi referred to a second creation based on the original work, which usually included some elements related to the original work. There had always been a debate about whether doujinshi was considered an intellectual property right. On the one hand, some legal experts believed that doujinshi was based on the original work, and the creative ideas and content were consistent with the original work, so there was no problem of copyright violation. In addition, they believed that the creators and readers of doujinshi were both inheriting and developing the original work, so there was no copyright dispute. On the other hand, some legal experts believe that doujinshi actually violates the copyright of the original work because the content and ideas of doujinshi are different from the original work, but they are creative adaptation and re-creation. They believed that the copyright of the original work should be protected, and any unauthorized re-creation should be regarded as an copyright violation. Therefore, whether or not a doujinshi was considered an copyright violation depended on the specific circumstances. If the content of the doujinshi is similar to the original work and it is not authorized by the original work, it may be considered as copyright violation. However, if the content of the doujinshi is different from the original work and the original work is authorized, then it will not be regarded as copyright violation. When creating doujinshi, it is recommended to carefully consider whether you have violated the copyright of the original work and comply with relevant laws and regulations.

Sequences to novels were usually considered as an act of copyright violation, especially when the content of the continuation was directly related to the original work. For example, he could copy the plot, characters, and locations of the original work directly into his own work or add his own imagination and creation on the basis of the original work. Continuing to write a novel may violate the copyright of the original work, so you need to obtain permission from the copyright owner. Without permission, the act of continuing to write a novel was an act of copyright violation. In addition, a continuation of a novel may also be considered plagiarism because the content of the continuation may directly copy or draw on some elements or plots of the original work. This kind of behavior also violated the relevant provisions of the copyright law and required the corresponding legal responsibility. Therefore, if one wanted to continue writing a novel, it was best to understand the relevant laws and regulations and ensure that their actions were legal.

Online literature involved copyright issues, so the creation and distribution of online literature needed to abide by copyright law. If the online literary works were copied, distributed, disseminated or adapted without authorization, it would constitute an copyright violation. However, not all online literature works constituted copyright. Some online literature platforms would manage the copyright of online literature works uploaded by their users and adapt, distribute, or spread them after the copyright expired. In this case, the content uploaded by the users of these platforms, which were regarded as the legal owners of copyright, was also considered legal. Other online literature works were inspired by existing works, so if these works quoted, borrowed, or adapted existing works, they needed to comply with relevant copyright laws. Online literature involves copyright issues, so when creating and spreading online literature, you need to abide by copyright laws to avoid copyright infringement.