Some people spend their whole lives doing bad things, but before they die, they find their conscience and help a weak person. Is he a good person or a bad person?

When a bad person does a good deed, the world may think that this is a kind of contradiction or a kind of sophistry, because the bad person itself means that there is a lack of moral and ethical standards. In this case, people might question whether the bad person was really a bad person or whether the good things he did were really worthy of praise. On the contrary, if a good person did something bad, people might understand and accept it more. This was because good people usually represented justice and moral standards while bad things represented immoral behavior. If a good person does something bad, it doesn't mean that he has lost his moral beliefs or values, but it means that he has done something that violates these values. To sum up, the world's views on a bad person doing a good thing and a good person doing a bad thing might be different. But what we should remember is that moral and ethical standards are constantly changing, and we should always maintain critical thinking and self-reflection to constantly update our values and moral standards.

The Six Nether with the Phoenix is a bad person. Liu Ming was a villain. He created demonic beasts and hurt many people in the demon world. He had also severed his master-disciple relationship with his disciple, Shen Muyue. Although the search results did not explicitly mention that Liu Ming was a bad person, based on the information provided, it could be inferred that his negative behavior and harm to other characters made him a bad person.

It could be inferred that the Six Phoenix Underworld were bad people. He was a villain, creating demon beasts and hurting many people of the demon world. In addition, he had also severed his master-disciple relationship with his disciple, Shen Muyue. Although the search results did not explicitly mention that Liu Ming was a bad person, based on the information provided, it could be inferred that his negative behavior and harm to other characters made him a bad person.

According to the information provided, Da Bao was not a bad person. He was described as a kind and innocent character. Although he looked like a fool on the surface, he was not a fool. He just had a slightly low IQ. The reason why he pretended to be dumb was to protect himself. Therefore, it could be said that Da Bao was a good person.

It could be inferred that the Six Phoenix Underworld were bad people. He was a villain, creating demon beasts and hurting many people of the demon world. In addition, he had also severed his master-disciple relationship with his disciple, Shen Muyue. Although the search results did not explicitly mention that Liu Ming was a bad person, based on the information provided, it could be inferred that his negative behavior and harm to other characters made him a bad person.

It could be inferred that Liu Ming in " Journey with the Phoenix " was a bad person. He was a villain who created demon beasts and hurt many people in the demon world. In addition, he had also severed his master-disciple relationship with his disciple, Shen Muyue. Although the search results did not explicitly mention that Liu Ming was a bad person, based on the information provided, it could be inferred that his negative behavior and harm to other characters made him a bad person.

Rootless was described as a complicated character in Under One Man. Some people thought he was a good person because he was sincere and helped others realize their wishes, and those who came into contact with him did not think he was a bad person. However, there were also people who thought he was a bad person because he organized the 36 Thieves and did many evil things. Moreover, his way of doing things often led to large-scale fights. Due to the inconsistent information provided, a clear conclusion could not be drawn.

According to the information provided, Da Bao was not a bad person. He was described as a kind and innocent character. Although he looked like a fool on the surface, he was not a fool. He just had a slightly low IQ. The reason why he pretended to be dumb was to protect himself. Therefore, it could be said that Da Bao was a good person.

There was no clear answer to the question of whether the shadow in " Celebrating Years " was a good person or a bad person. In the movie, the shadow's identity was a complicated character. There were both good and bad sides. He had experienced the bullying and humiliation of his family, and in revenge, he had killed his father and the entire family. However, he also became Chen Pingping's chief guard and played an important and complicated role in the play. Therefore, it was impossible to determine whether the shadow was a good person or a bad person.

In the novel " Celebrating Years," Sigu Jian was the guardian of Dongyi. His sword skills were fierce and he was called the master of the Sword Hut. He was a complicated character and could not be simply defined as a good or bad person. Sigu Jian's personality was cold and ruthless. He did not hesitate to sacrifice others to achieve his goals. He had established his own power in Dongyi and held great power, but his way of governing was very cruel. He was very harsh on the people and his subordinates. His actions caused many people to be dissatisfied and resist, but he did not care and continued to do as he pleased. However, Sigu Jian also had some aspects worthy of praise. He was very persistent in his pursuit of the Tao of the sword. His swordsmanship was superb and he was known as the number one sword in the world. He was also very protective of his disciples and did not hesitate to give up everything for them. He had also shown firm determination and courage in the face of foreign enemies, not hesitating to fight to the death with the enemy. All in all, Sigu Jian was a complicated character. His actions and personality had both advantages and disadvantages. His fate was also full of tragic colors. In the end, he died in a duel with Fan Xian.