May I ask if buying a physical book and then livestreaming it is considered copyright violation?

Infringements were usually civil cases where the victim filed a lawsuit to the court to demand compensation from the offender. In criminal cases, the violator may also be charged with intentional injury, intentional homicide and other crimes and sentenced to the corresponding punishment. However, it should be noted that even if the victim does not file a lawsuit in court, the offender may face civil compensation because the law inherently gives the victim the right to choose the damage.

Generally speaking, the act of buying a paid novel and then selling it would be considered as copyright violation because the time of copyright protection was calculated from the time when the novel was created, not the time after the payment was made. Although some novel websites allowed authors to download and use their works for free for a period of time after they were published, this did not mean that the authors had all the copyright rights to their works. If the author adapted, translated, re-created, and sold his work without authorization, it may constitute copyright violation. Therefore, if you want to sell a paid novel to someone else, you must obtain the authorization of the author or copyright owner. In addition, if you want to share paid novels on your own website, you also need to comply with the relevant provisions of the copyright law.

Adding a character from an anime to a novel as a supporting character without the authorization of the original author might constitute an copyright violation. This was because literary creation often created a new world by fictional elements such as characters, places, and events in the real world. And in these fictional worlds, there are sometimes characters related to the real world, such as characters in animations, movies, and other works. The rights of these characters may be violated. If a character from an animation was added to the novel as a supporting character, it was likely to violate the copyright of the original work. In this case, the original author's authorization was required to use it, otherwise it might constitute copyright violation. Of course, if the original author agreed to use their characters in the novel, then there would be no problem of copyright violation. However, if the original author did not agree, they still had to abide by their copyright laws to avoid violating their rights.

To determine whether a novel was involved in copyright infringement, many factors needed to be considered, such as the theme, plot, characters, language, and so on. At the same time, he had to consider the source of the novel and the copyright owner. If the novel was based on one's own creativity or an adaptation of an existing literary work, and the copyright owner did not explicitly express his opposition, then the novel would generally not be involved in copyright infringement. However, if the novel contains any unauthorized quote, adaptation, plagiarism, or any other form of creative elements, then it may be involved in copyright infringement. In this case, it was necessary to ensure that the novel did not violate the legal rights of the copyright owner. If the novel involves copyright violation, please contact the copyright owner and ask them for advice. If they agreed, they could modify and improve the novel to avoid copyright violation. If they disagree, they need to give up using the unauthorized elements and consider other solutions.

Using someone else's song to write lyrics could be a copyright issue if the lyrics were part of the novel. According to the copyright law, the creation of works must meet certain conditions to enjoy copyright, including: 1. Originality: The creation of a work requires one's own unique ideas and creative labor to enjoy copyright. 2. Works: The works must conform to the legal requirements of the elements, such as literary works, music, art, photography and other artistic forms. 3. Public publication: The copyright-protected works need to be publicly published, that is, spread, displayed, circulated, etc. in public places. If the lyrics did not violate the copyright of others and the content of the lyrics formed part of the novel, then there was no copyright issue. However, if the lyrics had nothing to do with the original song or were overly modified, it might violate the copyright of the original song. In addition, if the lyrics were not authorized by the original song owner, it might also involve copyright issues. Before writing the lyrics, it was recommended to understand the copyright status of the original song and the legal provisions to avoid unnecessary copyright issues.

Plundering another person's work is usually seen as a violation of copyright. The copyright refers to the rights that the author has over his work, including property rights and personal rights. Among them, property rights included copyrights, trademark rights, patent rights, and trade secret rights. If you plagiarize or plagiarize someone else's work, even if you don't get the original author's explicit permission, it will still constitute an act of copyright violation. This kind of behavior would cause the original author's property rights to be violated, and it might also cause damage to his personal dignity. In literary works, plagiarism and plagiarism were more common acts of copyright violation because the creation of literary works was more difficult and often required a long time of accumulation and thinking. Therefore, everyone should respect the intellectual property rights of others and avoid plagiarism and plagiarism.

Doujinshi referred to a second creation based on the original work, which usually included some elements related to the original work. There had always been a debate about whether doujinshi was considered an intellectual property right. On the one hand, some legal experts believed that doujinshi was based on the original work, and the creative ideas and content were consistent with the original work, so there was no problem of copyright violation. In addition, they believed that the creators and readers of doujinshi were both inheriting and developing the original work, so there was no copyright dispute. On the other hand, some legal experts believe that doujinshi actually violates the copyright of the original work because the content and ideas of doujinshi are different from the original work, but they are creative adaptation and re-creation. They believed that the copyright of the original work should be protected, and any unauthorized re-creation should be regarded as an copyright violation. Therefore, whether or not a doujinshi was considered an copyright violation depended on the specific circumstances. If the content of the doujinshi is similar to the original work and it is not authorized by the original work, it may be considered as copyright violation. However, if the content of the doujinshi is different from the original work and the original work is authorized, then it will not be regarded as copyright violation. When creating doujinshi, it is recommended to carefully consider whether you have violated the copyright of the original work and comply with relevant laws and regulations.

If the adaptation of a novel contained elements from the novel, or if the plot, characters, and other elements from the novel were directly transferred to the manga, then this act might constitute an copyright violation. Doujinshi refers to a second creation based on the same original work, usually including the original characters, plot and other elements. If a novel was adapted into a manga and the work contained elements from the novel, or if the plot, characters, and other elements from the novel were directly brought into the manga, then this behavior could be considered a doujin novel. However, the specific situation still needs to be determined according to the specific situation. If the adapted work is legal and does not violate the copyright of the original work, then the act of adaptation will not constitute copyright violation. At the same time, if the adapted work was legal and contained important elements of the original work, the act of adaptation might also be regarded as a tribute to the original work.

Whether or not writing an anime into a novel was considered an act of copyright violation required detailed analysis. If the plot, character image, scene, etc. of the novel had elements similar to those of an anime, then it might constitute an copyright violation. However, if a plot or character from an anime was used on the stage of a novel and there was no plagiarism or plagiarism of the intellectual property rights of the anime, then it would generally not constitute an copyright violation. However, even if there was no copyright violation, there could still be copyright disputes. For example, if a novel was similar to an anime, but the author thought that his work was better, he might face copyright disputes. Therefore, when writing a novel, it was best to register the copyright or seek copyright protection to avoid unnecessary risks. There was a risk of copyright violation when writing an anime into a novel, so it needed to be treated with caution when writing.

The Lord of the Rings was a classic fantasy novel based on the novel by JR R Tolkien. Due to copyright issues, the novel caused some controversy when it was first published. According to copyright law, it is illegal to copy, distribute, transmit, adapt, or perform a work without the permission of the copyright owner. Therefore, when Lord of the Rings was first published, some people claimed that the adaptation and distribution of the book violated their legal rights. However, according to the relevant provisions of the copyright law, copyright could be granted to the creator of the work or to the creator of the adaptation. If JR R Tolkien had already granted the copyright to the creator of The Lord of the Rings, then the copyright protection of the book would include the adaptation and subsequent performances. However, if the copyright was not explicitly granted to the creator, the adaptation and performance still needed the permission of the copyright owner. Therefore, whether or not it constituted an infringement required a specific analysis of the specific situation. If the copyright owner of Lord of the Rings had explicitly authorized the adaptation and performance, then these actions would not be considered as copyright infringement. However, if you need to adapt or perform without the permission of the copyright owner, it may be deemed as copyright violation. It should be noted that the copyright of the original work should be respected when adapting and performing the literary work to avoid the occurrence of copyright violation.