His global evolution content was the same as the one that bit the dog. Was his other name right hand? Could a different profile possibly violate copyright?

Dog Bite was the author of Global Evolution.

In the case where the novel had the same name but completely different content, if the copyright owner did not approve the name or there was no reasonable use of the name, it might constitute an copyright violation. In this case, the copyright owner may claim similarity or association to prove that the name has been widely used and constituted copyright. However, if novels with the same name but completely different content were published on different platforms and there were no unreasonable usage rules, it might constitute reasonable use. In order to avoid copyright violation, it is recommended not to directly copy other people's works when writing novels. Instead, you need to create your own novels and pay attention to copyright issues during the creation process. If there is a copyright dispute, it is recommended to consult a professional lawyer.

Evil Dragon. A book that was similar to this novel was "Overlord of the Deep Sea Evolution", which told the story of primitive creatures fighting each other and becoming the overlord of the planet. I hope you like this fairy's recommendation. Muah ~😗

The appearance of a person with the same name in a literary work did not necessarily violate the right to a name. The right to a name meant that an individual had the right to decide their own name and should be respected. However, if a person with the same name appears in a literary work, as long as the author does not deliberately use his identity or name, the right to a name will not be violated. This was because literary works were fictional and did not have real characters in the legal sense. Therefore, people with the same name appearing in the works were only fictional characters and did not belong to the author's identity. For example, if a character named Wang Hwa appeared in the novel and Wang Hwa happened to be the name of a person in the real world, then as long as the author did not deliberately use his own identity or name, he would not violate Wang Hwa's name rights. It should be noted that if the author deliberately used the name of a person in the real world, it might violate the name of that person. Therefore, authors should be careful when writing literary works to avoid violating the name rights of others.

Dog Bite was the author of Global Evolution.

According to the description, this novel might be called " The Legend of Tai Sui ". In the first chapter, the protagonist was put in the water by his roommate. He may face all kinds of challenges and difficulties, but in his left hand, there is an element that can bewitch women. His right hand has a powerful attack power. He needs to absorb the essence of the soul to enhance his strength. The setting of such elements and attack abilities usually attracted the interest of the readers and the plot of the novel could be very interesting and fascinating.

If Luo Zhixiang was the male lead of the novel, it might violate his name. According to article 7 of the Law of the People's Republic of China on the Right to Name, no one may engage in various activities with a false name or falsely use another person's name to harm the legitimate rights and interests of others. Using another person's name in a novel or fictional story without their consent may violate their right to a name. Therefore, when writing a novel, one should respect the intellectual property rights of the relevant characters and avoid using fake or fake names.

The names of different characters in different novels with the same content did not necessarily count as copyright. It depended on whether the names of the characters in different novels were the same and whether the same content was used separately. If the names of the characters in different novels are the same and the same content is used separately, it may be regarded as copyright violation. This was because the right to create and protect a work under the copyright law included the right to the name of the work, the right to the integrity of the work, the right to adapt, the right to translate, the right to display, and so on. If the same content is used separately, it may violate the rights of the name of the work, the integrity of the work, and so on, thus constitute an invasion. However, if the names of the characters in different novels are the same but the same content is used separately in different novels, it may not be considered as copyright violation. This is because the copyright of a work can vary according to the form, content, and source of the work. In this case, if the names of the characters in different novels were different and the same content was used separately in different works, it might not violate the copyright of the works. If the same content is used separately and the names of the characters in different novels are the same, it is recommended to contact the relevant author or copyright owner to confirm whether the same content can be used and obtain authorization.

Imitation of another person's work does not violate copyright, but copying, copying, adapting, or translating another person's work without identifying the author or copyright owner may constitute an act of copyright violation. In the process of imitating other people's works, if there are original elements such as new storylines, character creation, worldview, etc., then this imitation can be regarded as a creative act that does not violate copyright. However, if you simply copy, paste, adapt, or translate someone else's work without any original creation, then this behavior may constitute copyright violation. In addition, if the copyrights of the imitated work have been obtained by others, then copying, adapting, or translating the work again will also constitute copyright violation. Therefore, when imitating other people's works, one should pay attention to whether there are original elements and strictly abide by the relevant provisions of the copyright law.

The filming rights of a novel were not necessarily the same as the rights to make it into an animation. If the novel was written by a single person or team, the copyright may belong to that person or team, or it may belong to a single publishing company or co-publishing company. In this case, the copyright owner could decide to make the novel into a movie, television series, animation, or other form of work and authorized others to produce it. On the other hand, if the novel has been widely circulated and has become a work of high public awareness, its copyright may already belong to a certain publishing company or a joint publishing company, or it may be a public copyright. In this case, anyone could create any work related to the novel, including animation works. Therefore, to determine whether the filming rights of a novel were the same as the rights to make an animation, one needed to know the copyright owner of the novel, the usage of the copyright, and whether the novel had been widely distributed.