The debate competition is about the classics or the popular literature. The questions that can be asked in the free debate segment, I am on the side of the classics, so it is best to be original.

Both popular literature and classics were classics in literature, each with its own unique value and significance. Popular literature usually referred to novels that were easy to understand and suitable for the public to read, such as ancient Chinese novels such as Dream of the Red Chamber and Water Margins, as well as modern popular novels such as Harry Potter. These works usually had distinct characters, vivid plots, and humorous language to attract more readers. The classic works referred to those literary works that had been widely circulated in ancient or modern times, such as ancient Chinese novels such as Journey to the West and Romance of the Three Kingdoms, as well as modern Chinese novels such as Water Margins and Dream of the Red Chamber. These works usually had profound thoughts, rich characters, and grand narrative structures that could influence and inspire readers 'thoughts and aesthetics. Although popular literature and classical works have different forms of expression and reader groups in different periods and different cultural backgrounds, they are both important branches in the field of literature, with important literary value and cultural significance.

Greetings to the judges and contestants. Today, we will be debating a controversial topic: Is it better to read classics or popular literature? First of all, I would like to explain the difference between classics and popular literature. Classics are literary works that have been tested by time and history. They have profound ideology, rich cultural content, and excellent artistic expression. And popular literature was the most popular literary works in the current society. They were often time-effective and innovative, and were the products of the current cultural market. Although classics and popular literature were different in style and content, they both had their own unique charm. Classics can bring us deep thinking and enlightenment, from which we can draw nutrition to enhance our cultural accomplishment and life realm. And popular literature can bring us a relaxed and pleasant reading experience, allowing us to relax and enjoy the beauty of life. Of course, reading classics and reading popular literature had their own shortcomings. Classics often have complicated language and profound content due to the baptism of time. We need enough patience and time to understand them. However, popular literature had the problem of lacking in effectiveness and innovation. They often lacked depth and content, making people lose their thinking and immunity. Therefore, reading classics or popular literature should be decided according to personal interests and reading needs. If you pay more attention to the meaning and cultural value, then the classics are a good choice. If you're more focused on the ease and pleasure of reading, then popular literature is also a good choice. The most important thing is that we should keep an open mind and try different kinds of literary works to enrich our reading experience and life experience. Thank you, everyone, for listening. Thank you.

In a debate, the second debate usually requires three questions to support one's point of view. The following are the specific answers to these three questions: Do you think this view is correct? What is the significance of this argument? If this argument is wrong, why is it wrong?

During the debate, there might be questions about whether the advantages of the Internet outweighed the disadvantages or the disadvantages outweighed the advantages. This question depended on the viewpoint and stance of the party debating. Those who argue that the advantages of the internet outweigh the disadvantages may argue that the internet provides many conveniences and benefits. For example, the internet can make it easier for people to obtain information, communicate and shop, and can also increase productivity and creativity. The Internet could also promote innovation and development, bringing more opportunities and choices to people. In addition, the network could also protect privacy and information security to prevent information leakage and network attacks. On the contrary, those who argue that the disadvantages of the Internet are greater than the advantages may point out that the Internet also has many problems and dangers. For example, the spread of online rumors and false information will lead to social unrest and panic. Internet addiction and addiction will affect people's mental health and social ability. Internet attacks and security problems will affect the safety and stability of society. In addition, the Internet may also lead to regional discrimination and information imbalance because the information on the Internet is often one-sided and inaccurate. Therefore, the question of whether the advantages or disadvantages of the network outweighed the advantages or disadvantages in the debate needed to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the network according to the viewpoint and position of the debater, find out the relationship between the advantages and disadvantages, and try to convince the audience and judges through reasonable arguments and logical reasoning.

There was a difference in the influence of literary masterpieces and popular literature, but it did not mean that the influence of literary masterpieces would definitely be greater than that of popular literature. Famous literary works were usually produced by outstanding works that had been refined over time and tested by the readers. They had profound thoughts, beautiful language, and excellent artistic expression, which could lead the readers into a broader cultural world. These literary masterpieces not only had an important position in literature, but they could also influence society, politics, culture and other aspects. For example,"Dream of the Red Chamber" not only influenced Chinese literature, but also deeply influenced the development of Chinese feudal society, becoming an important chapter in the history of Chinese culture, while "War and Peace" influenced the development of world literature in the 20th century and became an important work in the history of French literature. In contrast, popular literature was usually created to meet the entertainment needs of readers. Its content was relatively easy to understand, and it often had a high effectiveness and targeted audience. Although popular literature could also have a great impact, its influence was often limited compared to literary masterpieces. This is because although popular literature can attract a large number of readers, its depth of thought and cultural content are often not rich enough to lead readers into a broader cultural world. In addition, due to the high target audience, popular literature often could not produce a wide range of social influence. Therefore, although literary masterpieces and popular literature have differences in the purpose of creation, content expression, and reader acceptance, they also have differences in literary influence. The literary classics had significant advantages in depth of thought, cultural content and leading social progress, while the popular literature paid more attention to the entertainment needs and effectiveness of the audience. Although popular literature could also have a great impact to a certain extent, its influence was often limited compared to literary masterpieces.

The following questions can be used to determine the success or failure of a hero debate and free debate: What is the definition of a hero? Can you judge a person by his achievements? If you judge a person based on his achievements, does it mean that a person who fails is not a hero? Should the definition of a hero take into account his actions and values? If a person's achievements and actions did not conform to his values, could he still be considered a hero? 4. What aspects should be considered when judging heroes? For example, should he consider his moral character, courage, kindness, and so on? If a hero is judged only by his achievements, does it mean that his strengths and weaknesses are equally obvious? Is it true that only successful heroes can be called heroes and not failed heroes? Should the definition of a hero take into account the background of the times and social environment? For example, was there a difference in the definition of heroes in different eras and social environments? Should heroes be respected and revered? If a hero is judged only by his achievements, should he be respected and revered? Should a hero be judged by his achievements and not by his character? If so, was this judgment reasonable? Should the definition of a hero take into account people's values and beliefs? For example, did different religions and cultures have different definition of heroes?

Honorable judges, dear audience, today, as the first debate of the affirmative side, I will explain to you the point of view that "discipline boosts the development of personality". First, we need to understand the relationship between discipline and personality development. Discipline is an important part of the social system and the foundation of social development and progress. On the other hand, personality development was the comprehensive development of a person's cognition, emotions, behavior, and many other aspects. It was an important way for a person to improve themselves. Thus, discipline and personality development complemented each other. However, in real life, we often find that discipline does not necessarily promote the development of personality in some situations. For example, in some schools, students were strictly disciplined but did not pay attention to the cultivation of students 'personalities. Such strict discipline often suppressed students' creativity and innovative spirit, resulting in students 'lack of independent thinking ability and practical ability. On the contrary, although some enterprises also discipline students, they pay attention to the individual development of employees, allowing employees to freely play in a relaxed environment. This loose discipline often promoted the creativity and innovation of employees and improved the competitiveness of enterprises. Thus, discipline and personality development were inseparable. In society, we should pay attention to cultivating students 'independent thinking ability so that they can judge right and wrong by themselves and decide their own behavior. At the same time, we should also focus on cultivating students 'ability to think independently and create independently. Only in this way can we better promote the development of discipline and personality to achieve the all-round development of people. Thank you!

Whether reading a classic or a novel was better was a subjective question that depended on one's personal interest and purpose. Classics are literary works that have stood the test of time. They contain rich ideas and cultural implications that can help readers understand human civilization and history in depth. On the other hand, novels were a kind of literary work that focused on stories. They were usually more relaxed and interesting, allowing the readers to relax and enjoy the pleasure of reading. If you have enough time and energy, I suggest you read the classics. Reading classics could help readers expand their knowledge and improve their reading ability and literary quality. On the other hand, novels were a more relaxing and interesting reading choice that could satisfy the readers 'entertainment needs. Of course, if time and energy were limited or if you just wanted to read some interesting novels, you could choose some excellent novels to read. Reading a novel can help the reader relax and improve the reading experience.

Affirmative point of view: You should read famous literary works. A literary masterpiece was a classic that had been tested over time and was widely praised. It contained a wealth of knowledge and ideas that could help people improve their cultural quality, broaden their horizons, and enlighten their minds. Through reading literary masterpieces, we can understand important issues in history, philosophy, sociology, psychology and other fields, gain deep thinking and insight, and enhance our critical thinking and logical thinking ability. Literature masterpieces are also wonderful works that can help us appreciate and enjoy the beauty of art. These works usually contain deep emotions and thoughts that can bring us emotional resonance and enlightenment. At the same time, these works can also express human emotions and thoughts in different ways, allowing us to have a deeper understanding of human culture and humanity. Reading literary classics can not only improve our cultural quality and aesthetic ability, but also make us better understand the world and life. Therefore, we should try our best to read literary classics to gain more enlightenment and gains from them.

The value of literary masterpieces and popular literature was a complicated question that had no simple answer. Here are some ideas that might help answer this question: The great works of literature usually have more depth and complexity. They express complex thoughts and emotions through more complicated language and structures. This complexity and depth are difficult to achieve in popular literature. Therefore, literary masterpieces may be more valuable because they can inspire us to think and understand more deeply. 2. Famous literature works usually have a wider audience because they have been proved to have important status and value in literature, history, culture and society. These masterpieces could not only satisfy one's reading needs but also provide inspiration and reference for others. Therefore, literary masterpieces may be more valuable because they can influence more people. 3. Popular literature usually focuses more on entertainment and legibility. They attract readers through more vivid language and plots. Although such literature may be more suited to individual needs, they usually lack depth and complexity and may not be comparable to literary masterpieces. Therefore, literary masterpieces may be more valuable because they can provide a more beneficial reading experience. The value of literary masterpieces and popular literature is also influenced by the era and cultural background. In some cultures, literary masterpieces may be more valuable because they represent the cultural, historical, and social context of the time. In other cultures, popular literature may be more valuable because they are more in line with the cultural needs and aesthetic standards of the time. Therefore, the value of literary masterpieces and popular literature is a complex issue that needs to be evaluated according to different eras and cultural backgrounds. To sum up, the value of literary masterpieces and popular literature was a complicated question with no simple answer. Different people have different views and values, so it needs to be evaluated according to the specific situation.