What was the difference between the expressions and techniques in modern literature?

The artistic technique and the way of expression were two related but different concepts. The artistic technique referred to the techniques and means used by the artist in the creative process to express the theme and emotions of the work. For example, an artist could use colors, lines, shapes, light, and other elements to express the theme of the work. Through these elements, the artist could convey his emotions and thoughts. The artistic technique was the basic element in the artistic process that determined the visual effect and inner meaning of the work. The way of expression referred to the information and opinions conveyed by the work of art, which were intended to make the audience understand and feel the work. The way of expression could be visual, auditory, verbal, psychological, and other different forms. It could also be direct, metaphorical, symbolic, and other different ways. The expression of a work of art determined the audience's understanding and feeling of the work. It was the soul of the work of art. Therefore, artistic techniques and expressions are related. Different artistic techniques can produce different expressions, and expressions can also affect the effects of artistic techniques. In the creation and appreciation of works of art, we need to consider artistic techniques and expressions in order to obtain a more comprehensive and in-depth understanding.

Writing techniques, rhetorical devices, and expressions were all commonly used terms in literature to describe. Writing techniques were used to create characters, plots, scenes, and topics. For example, the description techniques included portrait description, psychological description, environmental description, and so on. Rhetoric refers to the literary skills that make language more gorgeous, vivid, vivid, expressive, and infectious through specific techniques and techniques. Rhetoric techniques included metaphor, personification, exaggeration, comparison, and comparison. The expression method was used to convey the thoughts, emotions, and opinions of the character. The methods of expression included narration, description, discussion, and lyricism. In literature, writing techniques, rhetorical devices, and expression methods were related and influenced each other. Different writing techniques, rhetorical devices, and expression methods would produce different effects and styles according to different writing purposes and style-wise requirements.

Lyricism, discussion, description, and narration were common expressions in literature. The main difference lay in their purpose and function. - Lyricism is usually used to express the author's emotions, feelings, or thoughts so that the reader can better feel the author's inner emotions. Lyrical expressions were often expressed in poetry, prose, and other literary works. - Discussions are usually used to evaluate and analyze things or events to reveal their internal laws and meanings. Discussions were often expressed in the form of argumentative articles, comments, news, and so on. - Description is usually used to vividly describe people, environments, things, etc., so that readers can better feel their characteristics and images. The main forms of description were often novels, movies, and so on. In literary works, the comprehensive use of lyricism, discussion, description and narration can form a variety of different literary styles and characteristics to meet the needs and preferences of different readers.

Ancient literature and modern literature were very different in terms of style, theme, form, and content. 1 Style and theme Ancient literature usually paid more attention to describing the character's personality, psychology, fate, history, politics, and social background. Its style is mostly classical literature such as Tang poetry, Song Ci, Yuan Qu, etc., using lyric, description, discussion and other techniques. Modern literature, on the other hand, paid more attention to expressing one's feelings and experiences. For example, novels, poems, and essays used narration, description, and discussion. 2 Form and content Ancient literature was mostly composed of poems, novels, operas, etc. Among them, poetry was one of the most ancient and important forms of literature. The content mainly involved history, politics, philosophy, religion, and the lives, emotions, and thoughts of the characters. Modern literature was more diverse, including novels, essays, essays, reports, and so on. The content was more focused on expressing the emotions, experiences, and thoughts of contemporary society and individuals. 3 Ways to Express The ancient literary expressions were mostly chanting, singing, and depicting, focusing on the rhythm and beauty of the language. Modern literature, on the other hand, paid more attention to expressing thoughts, emotions, and experiences. It emphasized the conciseness, clarity, and power of the language. Although ancient literature and modern literature have some similarities, their styles, topics, forms and contents are very different, reflecting the characteristics and styles of different periods, societies and cultures.

The differences between modern literature and ancient literature can be considered from many angles. The following are some common differences: 1. Forms of literature: Ancient literature mainly consisted of poetry, prose, and novels, while modern literature covered a wider range of literary forms, including novels, dramas, movies, sports, prose, poetry, and so on. 2. The theme and content of ancient literature are usually based on history, politics, philosophy, religion, etc., while the theme and content of modern literature are more concerned with society, humanity, love, friendship, family, etc. 3. Literature style: The style of ancient literature was mainly classical Chinese and ancient poetry, while the style of modern literature was mainly vernacular Chinese, modern poetry, modern novels, etc. 4. literary schools: ancient literature had different literary schools such as Tang poetry, Song poetry, Yuan Qu, Ming and Qing novels, while modern literature had many different literary schools such as realism, romanticism, realism, post-realism, etc. 5. The influence of literature: The influence of ancient literature on modern literature and modern literature on ancient literature is also an important difference. The influence of ancient literature on modern literature includes literary forms, literary ideas, literary techniques, etc. The influence of modern literature on ancient literature is more reflected in the response and reflection of modern culture and society.

The difference between modern literature and contemporary literature usually lies in their historical background and writing style. Modern literature usually refers to the literary works created at the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century. These works reflect the changes and crises in various fields such as politics, economy, and culture at that time. The subjects of these works included social criticism, personal experience, romanticism, and modernism. Among them, the most famous ones were modern literature, Dickens, Mauricio, Tolstoy, and so on. Modern literature usually referred to the literary works created in the second half of the 20th century, including modernism, post-modernism, realism, magical realism, and other schools. These works usually focus on the reality and problems of contemporary society, such as race, sexism, global, environmental damage, etc. The representative works of contemporary literature included Ernest Hemmingway, Faulkner, Marquez, Mo Yan, and so on. In addition, modern literature and contemporary literature had different writing styles. Modern literature was usually more realistic and objective in describing the psychology and feelings of the characters, while contemporary literature was more subjective and symbolic in expressing the emotions and thoughts of the characters. At the same time, modern literature usually pays more attention to the norms and artistry of language and style, while contemporary literature pays more attention to expressing innovation and breaking through convention.

Ancient literature and modern literature are two different forms of literature. There are many differences. The specific differences are as follows: 1. Literature form: There are obvious differences between ancient literature and modern literature in terms of literary form. Ancient literature was usually presented in the form of poetry, prose, and novels, while modern literature was mainly presented in the form of novels, dramas, poetry, prose, and essays. 2. Literature theme: The theme of ancient literature usually involves history, legend, philosophy, morality and other aspects, while the theme of modern literature is more widely involved in society, politics, culture, human destiny and other aspects. 3. Literature style: The style of ancient literature was mainly in classical Chinese, focusing on the transmission of language and artistic conception. The style of modern literature was mainly in vernacular Chinese, focusing on the innovation of expression and form. 4. Literature acceptance: Ancient literature was influenced by traditional culture and values in terms of literature acceptance, while modern literature was impacted by Western culture and values. 5. Literature influence: Ancient literature has a profound influence on modern literature. Many ancient literary works have become classic works of modern literature. Modern literature had also produced many classic works such as Ernest Hemmingway's The Sun Also Rises, Faulkner's The Sound and the Fury, and Marquez's One Hundred Years of Solitude. The reason why modern literature is so valued is that people in modern society pay more attention to the reflection of literature on social reality and the concern for human destiny. Modern literature can better express this concern and reflect this demand. At the same time, modern literature also had more innovation and breakthroughs to better adapt to the development and changes of the times.

The main difference between prose and modern prose lies in the style and purpose of writing. Modern literature was a formal style of writing that was commonly used in reports, essays, novels, plays, and other literary works. Modern writing usually had a clear purpose of writing, such as expounding a point of view, describing the plot, expressing the theme, and so on. The purpose of modern writing was clear and needed to be expressed in the article. In contrast, prose was an unofficial style, usually used in diary, essay, poetry and other literary works. The purpose of writing prose is rather vague. There is no clear writing purpose, but it focuses on expressing the author's emotions, thoughts, and feelings. Prose usually does not need to be written in a specific format and can express the author's feelings and thoughts more freely. In addition, the number of words in prose was also different from modern prose. Modern literature usually requires a certain number of words, while prose is usually not limited by the number of words, allowing the author to express his thoughts and feelings more freely.

Modern literature and urban literature are two different literary styles and styles. There are differences in the following aspects: 1. Thesis and plot: Modern literature pays more attention to the description of the inner world of the characters, emphasizing the exploration of emotions and human nature, and the plot is more complicated and deep. But urban literature paid more attention to the details of urban life and the description of interpersonal relationships, emphasizing the tension and fast pace of urban life. 2. Style and language: The style of modern literature is more modern, the language is more concise and clear, and it pays more attention to expressing thoughts and emotions. At the same time, it also pays more attention to the use of literary skills and rhetorical devices. But urban literature paid more attention to describing the details of city life and the image of the characters. The language was more easy to understand and paid more attention to the expression effect and fluency of the language. 3. Thesis and genre: Modern literature has more diverse topics, including love, science fiction, history, politics, etc. At the same time, it also pays more attention to personal growth, workplace, emotional and other topics. The urban literature focused more on the description of urban life, including love, marriage, family, workplace, etc. It also paid more attention to the description of emotions and interpersonal relationships. 4. audiences and influence: modern literature pays more attention to the expression of literary value and ideology, pays more attention to the quality and depth of literature, and pays more attention to the reading experience and feelings of readers. On the other hand, urban literature paid more attention to the readers 'reading needs and market demand, paid more attention to the entertainment and legibility of the novel, and paid more attention to business operations and economic benefits.

There were the following differences when reading ancient and modern texts: 1. Different language styles: The language style of ancient prose is more rigorous, concise, and focused on the accuracy and authority of the expression. The modern language style was more free to use more spoken words and sentences, paying more attention to expressing emotions and effects. 2. Different ways of expression: the expression of ancient prose is more subtle, often through details and metaphor to express emotions and thoughts. The modern way of expression was more direct and focused more on the expression of facts and logic. 3. Different reading difficulty: Ancient prose is often difficult to understand due to the limitations of language style and expression. It needs to be understood in combination with context and background knowledge. Modern literature was relatively easy to read because it used simpler and more direct language expressions. 4. Different cultural backgrounds: Ancient prose often reflects ancient culture and values, which need to be understood in light of the cultural background and social environment at that time. On the other hand, modern literature reflected the culture and values of modern society, which needed to be understood in the context of the current cultural background and social environment.