If the snow was white, then 2 was greater than 3. Is it a true proposition?
Whether the answer to this question was true or not required specific analysis. If the snow is white, then we can assume that the snow is transparent, which means that we can infer its mass from its shape. According to the law of conservation of mass, the mass of an object does not change, so we can conclude that if snow is white, then its mass is 2. Now, let's extend this conclusion to a more general situation. If the properties of an object (such as color, mass, etc.) can be inferred in some way, then this inference is a true proposition. But if the property of the object itself is a false proposition, then even if we infer this conclusion, this conclusion is also a false proposition. Therefore, the question "if snow is white, then 2 is greater than 3" is a true proposition because it can be inferred from the facts we know. However, it should be noted that even if this inference is correct, it does not mean that the color of snow is white, because this question is only based on a premise, and the premise itself may not be correct.
