Reading the short novels of Mauricio de de Beaupassant, writing down the feelings

"Ode to a Nightingale."

In the novel Jewels, which was written by Maupassant, the protagonist Charlotte's father married her sister to his distant cousin in order to cover up his crime. Charlotte and her sister suffered all kinds of unfair treatment in their marriage. Finally, Charlotte escaped the oppression of marriage through her courage and wisdom and exposed her father's conspiracy to fight for equal treatment for herself and her sister. The story of Jewelry reflected the social class division and the gap between the rich and the poor in French society at that time, revealing the hypocrisy of the rich and the helplessness of the poor. Through the protagonist Charlotte's experience, the novel portrayed a society full of contradictions and injustice, making people realize the social injustice and the complexity of human nature. In addition, through Charlotte's courage and wisdom, the novel also shows the courage of human beings and the spirit of self-redemption, which provides readers with a kind of spiritual enlightenment.

The ending of the novel 'The Necklace' was unexpected and reasonable. This was because the plot of a novel was a process of constant evolution. The readers had already anticipated the ending of the story during the reading process. However, at the end of the story, the author suddenly threw out an unexpected ending. This twist made the novel more fascinating and enhanced the reader's sense of surprise. At the end of the novel, the protagonist Mathilde's vanity and greed are revealed, which makes her feel painful and guilty. However, at the end, the author arranged a new ending for Mathilde so that she could get rid of her past mistakes and start her life again. This new ending was unexpected because it exceeded the reader's expectations for the ending of the story and also matched the theme and plot development of the novel. The ending of the novel The Necklace, through unexpected twists and unexpected endings, not only enhanced the novel's legibility and dramaticness, but also profoundly revealed the greed and vanity of human nature.

Maupassant was a famous French short story writer and novelist. His works covered short stories, medium-length novels, and long novels. The following are some of the representative works of Mopassant: - Short Story Masterpiece: Pascal's Nose The Three Musketeers 3. Nicolas Capa Waiting for Godot - The representative work of the second chapter: 1. The Crusader 2. One Man's War 3. Nicolas Capa 4 King of the East - Representative novel: 1 Life 2 Afternoon 3. The World of Miserables 4. Markal Goncharov

Both Daudet and Beaupassant were famous French writers. Daudet was a famous German novelist in the 19th century, while Beaupassant was a famous French novelist, essayist, poet, and dramatist in the 19th century. Both of them had an important influence on world literature. Daudet's representative works included " Crusoe "," Carmen ", and so on. His representative works included " Camel Xiangzi "," Three Words and Two Pats ", and so on.

I'm not a fan of online literature. I'm a person who loves reading novels. I can answer questions about various languages. The full texts of the four selected short stories by Jean de Maurpassant are all in French, so I can't directly provide the full texts in Chinese. However, you can search for the original French texts of these articles online and download them. The full text of these articles should be a very valuable resource because they represent the peak of maupassant's short story creation.

Flaubert and maupassant are two of the most famous figures in french-their works have had a profound influence on modern literature. There was a short story between them that was also regarded as one of the important events in the history of French literature. Flaubert and maupassant were both masters of 19th-century French literature. They competed with each other in literature but were also good friends. Flaubert's representative works included The Catcher in the Rye, The Three-Body Problem, etc., while Mao Passant's representative works included Miserables, Camel Xiangzi, etc. Once Flaubert had attended a literary seminar with Mauricio. At the seminar, Flaubert gave a speech about his views on the short story. After listening to the lecture, Mao Passang also gave a speech at the seminar about his views on novels. After the speech, Flaubert and Maupassant exchanged opinions and decided to write an article to discuss their literary views. They decided to write a short essay on their own representatives to criticize each other. Flaubert wrote an essay about his views on the short story, saying that the short story should express strong emotions and theme in simple and vivid language. He also wrote an article about his views on novels, saying that novels should be based on complex plots and many characters to create a deep impression. After this article, Flaubert and Maurice met again to discuss their literary views. They criticized each other and appreciated each other at the same time, becoming important figures in the history of French literature. This literary discussion also became an important event in the history of French literature. It marked the beginning of the rich and colorful literary schools and creative styles in the history of French literature.

France's "Three Kings of the World's Short Stories" were: 1. Eurepides 2. Andrei Russell (Apollon Lever)

An example of a continuation of the necklace was as follows: When the protagonist of the maupassant bought the necklace in the mall, he did not know that there was a terrible story behind the necklace. A few days later, his wife found the necklace and felt uneasy. She confessed the secret behind the necklace. He was shocked and sad because he had always thought that the necklace was just an ordinary gift, but he had never thought that it would cause him so much pain. His wife passed away very quickly, leaving behind a heart-wrenching maupassant. He felt that he had lost everything, the most important thing in his life. However, he did not give up. He decided to find out the truth about the necklace and uncover the secret behind it. He spent a lot of time and energy investigating every detail and finally found out that the necklace was the murderer. It turned out that the maker of the necklace was a wealthy businessman who used his wealth and status to deceive his wife and put her in danger. He planned to use the necklace to murder his wife, but because his plan failed, the necklace was accidentally discovered by Maupassant. He realized that he had lost everything, but he had also become stronger and braver through this experience. He decided to pursue the legal responsibility of the murderer and return the necklace to his wife's family. He missed his wife dearly but also realized that the most important things in life were freedom and justice.

Marina realized that her necklace seemed to be a mystery, but she didn't know how to deal with it. She decided to consult a lawyer in Paris, but she didn't know how to make an appointment. She decided to visit her good friend, an architect named Emmanuel. Emmanuel told her that he knew a lawyer named Roland who could help her solve the problem. After hearing this, Marina was very happy and immediately went to Roland's law firm. There, she made an appointment with her lawyer. In the next few weeks, Marina would go to Roland's law firm every day to meet with the lawyer. She provided more details to the lawyer and the lawyer began to help her analyze the ownership of the necklace. In the end, the lawyer told Marina that her necklace did not belong to her but to her grandfather, who used to be active in the noble circles of Paris. The lawyer also told Marina that if she wanted to solve this problem, she needed to submit a certificate to prove that the real owner of the necklace was her grandfather. Marina was shocked, but she knew that she had to solve this problem. She decided to go to her grandfather and explain everything to him. When she found her grandfather, he told her that he didn't know who the real owner of the necklace was. He told Marina that he had always regarded the necklace as his own because he thought it was his family's inheritance. Marina was very disappointed, but she did not give up. She decided to ask Roland for help. Roland told Marina that he knew a jeweler named De Bernard who could help her solve this problem. So Marina went to Bernard's jewelry shop to show her her necklace.