In the college debate competition, the topic of debate was whether the college students 'major choice should be based on their personal interests or their future. I am the opposing side, seeking freedom to debate the problem,

College students participating in volunteer activities focused on training. On the contrary, it could be argued that college students participating in volunteer activities could not directly train their personal abilities, but might waste time and resources. Here are some possible counterarguments: 1. volunteer activities may affect college students 'studies. If college students participated in volunteer activities too frequently, it might take up their time and cause them to be unable to concentrate on their studies. Moreover, volunteer activities usually required a long time to participate in, which would have a certain negative impact on the health of college students. 2. volunteer activities do not provide practical work experience for college students. Although volunteer activities could cultivate college students 'sense of social responsibility and teamwork, these experiences could not be directly converted into professional experience. For most college students, their main goal was to find a job after graduation. Therefore, volunteer activities were not a necessary step in their career planning. 3. volunteer activities can't improve the academic performance of college students. Although volunteer activities can help students build a good sense of community and social responsibility, they can't directly improve students 'academic performance. Many college students participate in volunteer activities to find a better job after graduation rather than to enrich their studies. 4. The voluntary activities can't improve the professional skills of college students. Although volunteer activities can help students develop their leadership and teamwork skills, they cannot directly improve their professional skills. For many college students, they need to learn professional knowledge in school in order to find a better job after graduation. Therefore, volunteer activities were not a necessary step for them to improve their skills.

In a debate, the second debate usually requires three questions to support one's point of view. The following are the specific answers to these three questions: Do you think this view is correct? What is the significance of this argument? If this argument is wrong, why is it wrong?

On the contrary, high school students shouldn't be in love. Here are some materials that support this view: 1. Falling in love will have a negative impact on learning. High school students were in the middle of learning important knowledge. Falling in love could distract them and cause their academic performance to drop. 2. Love can lead to emotional problems. It was normal for high school students to have emotional problems during puberty. However, if the relationship is unhealthy, it may lead to emotional problems affecting their mental health. 3. Love might affect their future development. High school students should focus on their studies so that they could have a good future. Falling in love might distract them and cause their studies to decline, affecting their future development. Love may affect their image. High school students were educated in school, and their image was also the image of the school. If their relationship was seen by other students, it might affect their image and their status in school. Love may affect their social relationships. High school students should focus on their studies so that they can have a good social relationship in the future. If their relationship was seen by other students, it might affect their social relationships and their future opportunities.

It shouldn't be. Although the 1999 International College Debate Competition's finale might be popular with readers, it might not necessarily be a suitable work for a sequel. First of all, each work had its own unique characteristics and style. If a sequel was made, it might repeat or strengthen the characteristics of the previous one instead of creating a new story. Secondly, the classic works might be outdated or criticized for damaging the image and value of the previous works. Therefore, even though " 1999 International College Debate Final Success " might be a successful work, it might not be a good choice to make a sequel.

The development of the Internet has more advantages than disadvantages for literature. The slogan of the debate competition is as follows: 1. Make literature better: The development of the Internet creates a better environment for the development of literature, making literary works closer to readers and more colorful. 2. Online literature is also literature: the development of the Internet not only allows online literature to be more widely spread, but also improves the quality and level of literature, making literature more diverse and rich. 3. The development of the Internet has promoted literary innovation: The development of Internet technology has provided more opportunities and platforms for literary innovation, allowing literature to be closer to the needs of the times and readers. 4. Let literature go global: The development of the Internet makes it easier for literature to go global, attracting more readers and authors, expanding the influence and coverage of literature. The development of the Internet makes literature more convenient: The development of the Internet makes literature more convenient. The readers can read literary works anytime and anywhere, and it also provides more opportunities and platforms for literary writers to create.

The development of the Internet had more advantages than disadvantages for literature. 1. Online literature helps literary creation to promote the prosperity of literature. 2. Online development of literary peers. Online literature is a new window for literature, providing readers with a wider range of reading choices. 4. The development of the internet and the advancement of literature. 5. Make online literature a part of literature to bring readers a better reading experience. Online literature is the future of literature, injecting new impetus into the development of literature. 7. The development of literature on the Internet. 8. Online literature provides readers with a brand new literary experience, contributing to the literary cause. Online literature is an indispensable part of literature, injecting new vitality into literary development. 10. A win-win situation for the development of literature on the Internet.

Network pros and cons As a modern communication tool, the Internet provided a convenient and fast way for people to communicate. The benefits of the internet included: 1. The Internet allows us to obtain information more easily. Through the network, we can access all kinds of information resources, including news, articles, videos, etc., anytime and anywhere. Moreover, these contents can be shared on various platforms, making the information more diverse and rich. The Internet can also help us learn and educate better. Through the internet, we can access various online courses, learning resources, library materials, etc., so that we can have a deeper understanding of various knowledge fields to improve our learning ability and level. The internet also provides us with more entertainment. Through the internet, we can access all kinds of videos, games, social media, etc. to enrich our entertainment life. However, there were also some negative effects of the Internet. The internet could also lead to the spread of false information. Through the internet, we can access all kinds of information, but this information may come from unreliable sources, which will cause us to receive wrong information and affect our judgment and decision-making. 2. The Internet could also lead to the leakage of personal privacy. Through the internet, we can easily access all kinds of sensitive personal information such as home address, phone number, etc., which may lead to the risk of personal information leakage. The internet could also lead to the spread of violence and hate speech. Through the internet, we can come into contact with all kinds of extreme speech and violence, which may have a negative impact on society. To sum up, the internet is a tool with both positive and negative effects. We need to use and manage the network correctly to maximize its advantages and avoid its negative effects.

Honorable judges, dear audience, today, as the first debate of the affirmative side, I will explain to you the point of view that "discipline boosts the development of personality". First, we need to understand the relationship between discipline and personality development. Discipline is an important part of the social system and the foundation of social development and progress. On the other hand, personality development was the comprehensive development of a person's cognition, emotions, behavior, and many other aspects. It was an important way for a person to improve themselves. Thus, discipline and personality development complemented each other. However, in real life, we often find that discipline does not necessarily promote the development of personality in some situations. For example, in some schools, students were strictly disciplined but did not pay attention to the cultivation of students 'personalities. Such strict discipline often suppressed students' creativity and innovative spirit, resulting in students 'lack of independent thinking ability and practical ability. On the contrary, although some enterprises also discipline students, they pay attention to the individual development of employees, allowing employees to freely play in a relaxed environment. This loose discipline often promoted the creativity and innovation of employees and improved the competitiveness of enterprises. Thus, discipline and personality development were inseparable. In society, we should pay attention to cultivating students 'independent thinking ability so that they can judge right and wrong by themselves and decide their own behavior. At the same time, we should also focus on cultivating students 'ability to think independently and create independently. Only in this way can we better promote the development of discipline and personality to achieve the all-round development of people. Thank you!

In a debate, the three debaters were usually responsible for concluding their statements, putting forward their views, and refuting the key characters of the opponent. Here are some techniques to help you make a strong argument in a debate: 1. define the problem: you need to define the problem clearly before you start the debate. This meant that one needed to understand the background and meaning of the debate in order to express their views in the debate. Whether watching TV was harmful for primary school students needed to be clearly defined, such as the time and frequency of watching TV, as well as the content. 2. Clear Position: A position that requires clear support in a debate. This would help in the debate and answer the other party's questions. When answering the other party's question, he needed to clearly state his position. Propose your own point of view: You need to put forward your own point of view in the debate. He could consider the problem from multiple perspectives, such as time, content, frequency, and so on. He needed to make sure that his ideas were clear and could be proven. 4. Rebutting the opponent: In a debate, you need to refute the opponent's point of view. He could use facts, data, and expert opinions to refute his opponent's point of view and prove his own point of view. He needed to make sure that the rebuttal was strong and could be proven. Closing Remarks: A closing statement is required at the end of the debate. He needed to emphasize his own point of view and point out the other party's problems and shortcomings. It was necessary to ensure that the summary was clear and could support the subsequent debate.

As the second defender, you can ask the other party the following questions: Please give an example of why society should value profit over righteousness. For example, you can ask the other party,"Why should society value profit over righteousness?" Make the other person understand your argument and provide some concrete examples to support it. For example, you might say," Because the interests of society are money and material wealth, and ethics are concerned with people's inner values." Please explain why it is beneficial to society to value profit over righteousness. You can ask the other party,"Why is it good for society to value profit over righteousness?" Make the other person understand your argument and provide some concrete examples to support it. For example, you might say," Prioritizing profit over justice makes society more efficient and orderly because people are more focused on business interests than ethics." Please explain why ethics should not be replaced. You can ask the other person,"Why shouldn't ethics be replaced?" Make the other person understand your argument and provide some concrete examples to support it. For example, you might say," Morality can help us form the right values, and money and material wealth are only a part of human society. Therefore, ethics are indispensable." 4. Please give an example of how to value profit over righteousness in practice. You can ask the other party,"Why is it so obvious in practice to value profit over righteousness?" Make the other person understand your argument and provide some concrete examples to support it. For example, you might say," A lot of business activities are based on the principle of profit over justice, such as greedy business giants and illegal monopolies." I hope these questions will help you better ask the other person and support your argument.