Is there any great god who knows how to debate? The topic of debate is that the real-name system on the Internet is not conducive to the discussion of public issues, and the opposing side is not conducive to the discussion of public issues. How should we fight?

It was a question worth exploring whether the internet language was beneficial to the development of literature. Internet language is the rise of the development of network technology. It is featured by concise, intuitive, easy to understand, and can quickly convey information. The application of network language in literature can make the works more vivid, vivid and fascinating, enhance the expressiveness and appeal of the works, and help readers better understand and feel the meaning of the works. However, we can't ignore some of the negative effects of online language. The use of online language often carried a strong sense of the times and commerce. The use of some online language may bring a certain degree of vulgar and commercial tendencies to the work. It was difficult to guarantee the accuracy and standard of the online language. Some online language might have grammar errors, inappropriate words, and other problems that might affect the quality of the work. Therefore, I believe that the use of online language in literature should be moderate and should pay attention to the norms and accuracy of the language. We should pay attention to the understanding and application of online language in the creative process to avoid negative effects on the work. At the same time, we should strengthen the standard management of network language and formulate corresponding standards and regulations to ensure the quality and accuracy of network language. In this way, the online language could better serve the development of literature and bring a better reading experience to readers.

The fast-food culture was indeed not conducive to the development of literature. Fast food culture often focused on speed, convenience, and taste rather than the quality of the content. In the fast-food culture, people often only pay attention to the appearance of food and ignore the intrinsic quality of food. In contrast, literature required the author to spend a lot of time and energy to create, conceive, and write in order to create deep, thoughtful, and infectious works. Fast food culture often lacked the artistic quality of literature. The works in the fast-food culture were often designed to cater to the readers 'tastes and lacked literary artistry. In contrast, literature required the author to use various rhetorical devices to attract the readers 'attention and resonate with them through unique ideas and plots. The market demand of fast-food culture for literary works was also not conducive to the development of literature. The demand of fast-food culture for literary works was often short-sighted and existed to satisfy the temporary needs of readers. In contrast, literary works need to satisfy the long-term needs of readers, and it needs to arouse readers 'thinking and reflection, so as to promote readers' understanding of society and life. To sum up, fast food culture was not conducive to the development of literature. We should pay more attention to literature and encourage authors to spend more time and energy creating high-quality literary works to meet the needs of readers.

Alright, let's start the debate. Prosperity is more conducive to achieving our ideals because prosperity can provide us with more opportunities and conditions to achieve our ideals. In good times, we have more resources and conditions to support our work, and it is easier for us to get the support and recognition of others. Prosperity can also make us more confident and confident in pursuing our ideals because we know that we have enough resources and conditions to realize them. On the contrary, adversity is more conducive to the realization of ideals because it will bring us more challenges and difficulties. We need to spend more time and energy to overcome these difficulties. In adversity, we may feel lost, depressed, and helpless, but these emotions can help us pursue our ideals more firmly. Adversity can also make us more mature and wiser because we have to grow through struggle and challenge. The process of realizing one's ideals in reality often involved the alternating between good and bad. We need to work hard in favorable circumstances and strengthen our beliefs in adversity. Only in this way can we overcome all difficulties and realize our ideals.

Alright, let's discuss this topic. Prosperity is more conducive to the realization of ideals, because prosperity can provide more resources and opportunities, these resources can help people in the process of achieving their ideals more smoothly. For example, if a person grew up in a favorable environment, he might get more educational opportunities, better job opportunities, and more opportunities to achieve his career goals. In addition, good times can also help people increase their self-confidence and self-esteem. These qualities can help people better deal with challenges and difficulties. On the contrary, adversity is more conducive to the realization of ideals, because adversity can provide more challenges and opportunities, which can help people grow and progress. For example, if a person grows up in adversity, he may encounter more setbacks and difficulties. These setbacks and difficulties can help people strengthen their perseverance and resilience to better deal with future challenges. In addition, adversity can also help people discover their potential, making people more aware of what they really want, which helps people better realize their ideals. Of course, good times and bad times weren't absolute. The specific situation still needed to be analyzed. For example, under certain circumstances, adversity may be more conducive to the realization of ideals because adversity can make people cherish what they have more and better develop their potential. In addition, in some cases, prosperity may be more conducive to achieving one's dreams because it can provide more opportunities and resources to help people better achieve their career goals. Both good and bad situations could be conducive to the realization of ideals. The specific situation still needed to be analyzed.

Opposite side: There is no true friendship on the Internet. Although online friendships were not as intuitive and easy to feel as face-to-face friendships, online friendships could also have real friendships. Online friendships required mutual trust and respect, as well as a willingness to maintain relative privacy and caution on the Internet. Although online communication may not be as direct and real-time as face-to-face communication, both parties can maintain contact through text, voice, video and other means to share each other's lives and emotions, which can also establish a true friendship. Online friendships could also be built on social relationships in the virtual world. Although this relationship may not be as close and deep as the friendship in real life, it can also be a real friendship because both parties can communicate, support and encourage each other in the virtual world to establish an emotional bond similar to family or friendship. Although there might be some misunderstandings, distrust, and contradictions in online friendships, this did not mean that there were no real friendships on the Internet. As long as both parties were willing to maintain caution and respect, and were willing to seek understanding and communication on the Internet, they could establish a true friendship. Therefore, we should not simply regard online friendships as a kind of "fake" friendship, but should realize that online friendships can also have real feelings and meanings.

Topics like erection stories are not only inappropriate for public discussion but also violate social norms and ethics. We should uphold a positive and respectful communication environment, so it's crucial to stay away from such topics.

No. Adult breastfeeding is a very private and often inappropriate topic for public discussion. It involves behavior that goes against social norms and can make many people uncomfortable.

Definitely not. These types of stories are not appropriate in a public setting. They can make people uncomfortable and can also have a negative impact on the overall social environment. Public spaces are for positive, family - friendly, and ethical discussions.

College students participating in volunteer activities focused on training. On the contrary, it could be argued that college students participating in volunteer activities could not directly train their personal abilities, but might waste time and resources. Here are some possible counterarguments: 1. volunteer activities may affect college students 'studies. If college students participated in volunteer activities too frequently, it might take up their time and cause them to be unable to concentrate on their studies. Moreover, volunteer activities usually required a long time to participate in, which would have a certain negative impact on the health of college students. 2. volunteer activities do not provide practical work experience for college students. Although volunteer activities could cultivate college students 'sense of social responsibility and teamwork, these experiences could not be directly converted into professional experience. For most college students, their main goal was to find a job after graduation. Therefore, volunteer activities were not a necessary step in their career planning. 3. volunteer activities can't improve the academic performance of college students. Although volunteer activities can help students build a good sense of community and social responsibility, they can't directly improve students 'academic performance. Many college students participate in volunteer activities to find a better job after graduation rather than to enrich their studies. 4. The voluntary activities can't improve the professional skills of college students. Although volunteer activities can help students develop their leadership and teamwork skills, they cannot directly improve their professional skills. For many college students, they need to learn professional knowledge in school in order to find a better job after graduation. Therefore, volunteer activities were not a necessary step for them to improve their skills.

Definitely not. Public spaces are for general and positive conversations. Sexual stories should be kept private.