Now, we are going to have a debate competition. The negative side's debate topic is more important for the creative ability of the work of art. The positive side's inspiration for the creation of the work of art is more important. We are the negative side.

The theme of this debate was about the importance of doing and talking. The positive side believed that doing was more important than talking, while the negative side believed that talking was more important than doing. Affirmative point of view: actions are more important than words. Because doing was a practical action that could bring direct and practical benefits. When we make a decision or action, we are actually responsible for it and trying to achieve it. Only when we put our ideas and beliefs into action can we prove that they are correct. In contrast, verbal expressions could not bring about actual changes. Opposite point of view: Saying is more important than doing. This was because it allowed people to express their thoughts and opinions, thereby arousing the resonance and support of others. By speaking, we can pass on information and knowledge to help others better understand our views and beliefs. In addition, it can also bring certain social benefits, allowing us to establish connections and interactions with others. The outcome of this debate depended on the opinions and arguments of both parties. In the end, it had to be judged based on facts and logic. Both sides needed to provide sufficient evidence and reasons to convince the audience.

The negative effects of pop songs mainly included: Air Pollution: Many pop songs are accompanied by intense drumming and singing. This music may produce noise and pollute the air. 2. Affects mental health: pop songs may cause listeners to get excited and lose control of their emotions, especially at night or when they are alone. These types of music can have a negative impact on mental health. 3. Waste of resources: Many popular songs need to be purchased or downloaded, which will lead to a waste of resources. In addition, the spread of popular songs could also lead to copyright issues. However, pop songs also had positive effects. 1. Promotion of cultural exchange: pop songs are an important part of cultural exchange. They can help people better understand and appreciate different music and cultures across cultural differences and language barriers. 2. Stimulate creativity: Many popular songs are created by independent musicians and artists. This music inspires people's creativity and imagination, which has promoted the development of the music industry. 3. Stimulating consumption: pop songs can motivate listeners to buy goods and digital products to promote economic development. To sum up, pop songs had both negative and positive effects. It was a complicated question whether popular songs should be restricted or banned, which required a comprehensive consideration of various factors.

The conclusion of the opposing side of the online pros and cons debate: The advantages of the network: 1. Ease: The Internet makes information transmission faster and more convenient. People can obtain information from any part of the world in a few seconds. 2. Freedom: The Internet is a free space where people can freely express their thoughts and opinions on the Internet without restrictions. Sharing: The Internet allows people to share their knowledge and experience, making knowledge more universal and shared. 4. Creation: The Internet provides more opportunities for people to create and start businesses. People can achieve more innovation and inventions through the Internet. Weakness of the Internet: Fake: The authenticity and credibility of online information are questioned. Some information may be processed and processed to lack authenticity. 2. Misleading: Information on the Internet spreads very quickly. Some information may be mistransmitted and misinterpreted to mislead people's judgments and decisions. 3. Invasion of privacy: The spread of online information may invade people's privacy and expose people's personal information. 4. Addiction: Overuse of the Internet may cause people to be addicted to the online world and affect their physical and mental health. To sum up, the network has many advantages and disadvantages. When using the network, we need to rationally view its advantages and disadvantages, make full use of its advantages and avoid its disadvantages, so as to better use the network to bring more value to our society and individuals.

As a positive, you can consider asking the following questions to question the negative: 1 What is "our youth is our own decision"? In this sentence, who should make this decision? What did this decision mean? If youth needs to make decisions, what should these decisions be like? Does it include immoral or inappropriate decisions? If a person can't make his own decision, then is there any meaning to his youth? Are there enough resources for everyone to make their own decisions? If so, where did these resources come from? If not, then why? Should a person be blamed or punished if he cannot make his own decisions? If so, was this accusation or punishment reasonable? 6. Do those who make their own decisions receive the respect and support they deserve? If so, why? If not, then why? Is there enough education and social training to help people make the right decisions? If so, where was the training conducted? If not, then why? If a person's youth is limited or deprived, does he still have the right to pursue his dreams and goals? If so, why? If not, then why? These questions can help you better understand the opposing side's point of view and arguments in order to better debate.

Alright, I can provide you with some counter-questions. 1. If the sequels change the original core elements of a successful work, such as the plot, characters, or worldview, should these changes be accepted? If you have to accept changes, will these changes destroy the unique charm and value of a successful work? Does making two sequels mean disrespect to the previous work? If so, would this disrespect lead to misunderstanding and destruction of the previous work? Would a 3-star sequela lead to the commodification of the work and maximize the benefits? If so, would the real value of the work be weakened due to this kind of commerce and profit? Would four sequels lead to a time limit and limited creative space? If so, would this restriction lead to a decline in the quality of the work? Will the sequels cause the fan base of the work to split and lose? If so, would this division and loss lead to the true value of the work being weakened? I hope these questions will help you better understand the opposing side's point of view. Now, we can start a free debate. Please raise your views and questions.

The affirmative side could debate around the following points: Contribution and return are closely related: there is a close relationship between contribution and return. Only by giving first can you expect to get a return. Whether it was in work, study, or personal life, we all need to put in effort and sweat before we can reap results and rewards. Therefore, in the debate, it can be emphasized that effort and reward are related. Only by putting in enough effort can you get the corresponding reward. The returns are usually visible: the returns between effort and return are usually visible. When we put in effort, we usually see the corresponding results and gains. For example, when we put in enough effort in work or study, we usually get rewards such as improvement and harvest. Therefore, it can be emphasized in the debate that the reward is usually visible, and only by putting in enough effort can you see the corresponding reward. 3. Contribution and return are proportional: Contribution and return are proportional. Our efforts and returns are usually proportional. Only by putting in enough effort can we get the corresponding returns. For example, when we put in enough effort at work, we usually get a higher position, better salary, and other rewards. Therefore, in the debate, it can be emphasized that effort and return are proportional. Only by putting in enough effort can you get the corresponding return. Success requires constant effort: the relationship between effort and return is constantly accumulating and sublimating. Only by constantly putting in effort could one continuously reap rewards. Success is not something that can be achieved overnight. It requires constant perseverance and hard work. Therefore, it can be emphasized in the debate that success requires constant effort. Only by putting in enough effort can you achieve continuous success. The above are some points that the positive side can revolve around. They can be freely developed and supplemented according to the specific situation and topic of the debate.

Opposite side: There is no true friendship on the Internet. Although online friendships were not as intuitive and easy to feel as face-to-face friendships, online friendships could also have real friendships. Online friendships required mutual trust and respect, as well as a willingness to maintain relative privacy and caution on the Internet. Although online communication may not be as direct and real-time as face-to-face communication, both parties can maintain contact through text, voice, video and other means to share each other's lives and emotions, which can also establish a true friendship. Online friendships could also be built on social relationships in the virtual world. Although this relationship may not be as close and deep as the friendship in real life, it can also be a real friendship because both parties can communicate, support and encourage each other in the virtual world to establish an emotional bond similar to family or friendship. Although there might be some misunderstandings, distrust, and contradictions in online friendships, this did not mean that there were no real friendships on the Internet. As long as both parties were willing to maintain caution and respect, and were willing to seek understanding and communication on the Internet, they could establish a true friendship. Therefore, we should not simply regard online friendships as a kind of "fake" friendship, but should realize that online friendships can also have real feelings and meanings.

First of all, we need to make it clear that the purpose of the debate is not to refute the other party's point of view, but to convince the other party to accept our point of view. Therefore, before refuting the other party's point of view, we need to think about how to better express our point of view. If the other party thinks that jokes do more harm than good to the spread of history, we can refute it from the following aspects: Jokes could allow people to understand history more deeply. Joking not only allowed people to understand the background and details of historical events, but also allowed people to understand the views and attitudes of different figures in historical events, so as to better understand the evolution of historical figures and historical events. Joking could improve people's cultural quality. History is an important part of culture, and jokes can be used as an interesting form of cultural expression to let people better understand and understand history and culture. Jokes could enrich people's entertainment life. Although historical events were important, they were often boring. Joking could be used as a form of entertainment to let people understand historical events in a relaxed atmosphere and improve their quality of life. To sum up, we can come to the conclusion that although the joke may bring some negative effects, it plays an important role in the popularity of history. It can make people have a deeper understanding of history, improve cultural quality and enrich their entertainment life. Therefore, I think the joke has more disadvantages than advantages for the popularity of history.

Competition and cooperation were both important in life. There was no absolute contradiction between the two. Competition can stimulate people's creativity and innovation, and encourage people to constantly improve their abilities in their respective fields. At the same time, competition could also encourage people to learn from each other and improve together through cooperation. In the competitive modern society, we need to have keen insight and flexible response strategies to stand out in the fierce competition. Cooperation allowed people to help and support each other to achieve greater success with a common goal. In teamwork, people could use their own strengths to complete a task together to achieve better results. In addition, cooperation could also promote the development and progress of society and create more value for human society. We have seen many successful examples in modern society. For example, many successful companies in the technology field relied on teamwork. In the business world, many successful companies achieved success through teamwork. In addition, many outstanding students in the field of education also achieved their goals through teamwork. Therefore, we believe that competition and cooperation are both important in life. On the road of fierce competition in life, we need to have keen insight and flexible response strategies to stand out in the fierce competition; on the road of cooperation, we need to learn to cooperate and play our respective advantages to complete a task together to achieve greater success.

Dear judges and audience, the topic for today's debate is "Don't do small things". We think it's a noble quality not to do small things. We often encounter all kinds of small things in our lives, such as sorting garbage, saving water, respecting others, and so on. These things may seem insignificant, but they are very important to our lives and the development of society. Not doing small things can help us better protect the environment. If everyone could do small things such as sorting garbage and saving water, they could reduce the waste of garbage and water resources and protect the environment. In this way, our earth can serve us better and make us happier and healthier. Not doing small things can help us respect others better. Everyone has their own unique personality and habits. If everyone can not do small things such as not littering, not interrupting others, etc., a good social atmosphere can be formed to promote the harmony of interpersonal relationships. That way, we can respect others better and make our society warmer and better. Not doing small things can also help us develop society better. Society is made up of everyone. If everyone can not do small things, such as not littering, not interrupting others, etc., good social behavior and morality can be formed, and the overall development of society will be more orderly and efficient. To sum up, not doing small things is a noble quality. It can help us better protect the environment, respect others, and develop society. Therefore, we should start with small things and do small things to make our lives and society better. Thank you.