In the debate competition, I am the affirmative and second debate. The debate topic society should value profit over righteousness. How should I ask the other party questions? I want examples.

In a debate, the second debate usually requires three questions to support one's point of view. The following are the specific answers to these three questions: Do you think this view is correct? What is the significance of this argument? If this argument is wrong, why is it wrong?

Affirmative point of view: You should read famous literary works. A literary masterpiece was a classic that had been tested over time and was widely praised. It contained a wealth of knowledge and ideas that could help people improve their cultural quality, broaden their horizons, and enlighten their minds. Through reading literary masterpieces, we can understand important issues in history, philosophy, sociology, psychology and other fields, gain deep thinking and insight, and enhance our critical thinking and logical thinking ability. Literature masterpieces are also wonderful works that can help us appreciate and enjoy the beauty of art. These works usually contain deep emotions and thoughts that can bring us emotional resonance and enlightenment. At the same time, these works can also express human emotions and thoughts in different ways, allowing us to have a deeper understanding of human culture and humanity. Reading literary classics can not only improve our cultural quality and aesthetic ability, but also make us better understand the world and life. Therefore, we should try our best to read literary classics to gain more enlightenment and gains from them.

The second and third debates of the debate competition should be based on the topic of "literary works should not be remade into movies". The questions should be asked from the following aspects: 1. The difference between a movie and a literary work: Ask about the difference between literature and a movie. For example, can a movie completely restore the content of a literary work? Will it affect the original atmosphere and artistic conception of a literary work? 2. Questions about intellectual property rights: Ask questions about intellectual property rights, such as whether the remake will violate the copyright of the literary work, whether it will lead to the loss of copyright of the work, etc. 3. Transformation effect of literature and film: Ask about the transformation effect of literature and film. For example, whether the film can completely restore the meaning of the literary work, whether it will affect the theme and plot of the literary work. 4. Audience acceptance: Ask audience acceptance questions, such as whether the audience is more likely to accept literary works being remade into movies or prefer to watch original literary works. 5. The significance of the remake: Ask the significance of the remake, such as whether it will help to promote the literary works, whether it will have a positive impact on the spread of literary works, etc. These are some of the possible questions that may be raised. The specifics still need to be considered according to the topic of debate and the situation of the competition.

During the debate, there might be questions about whether the advantages of the Internet outweighed the disadvantages or the disadvantages outweighed the advantages. This question depended on the viewpoint and stance of the party debating. Those who argue that the advantages of the internet outweigh the disadvantages may argue that the internet provides many conveniences and benefits. For example, the internet can make it easier for people to obtain information, communicate and shop, and can also increase productivity and creativity. The Internet could also promote innovation and development, bringing more opportunities and choices to people. In addition, the network could also protect privacy and information security to prevent information leakage and network attacks. On the contrary, those who argue that the disadvantages of the Internet are greater than the advantages may point out that the Internet also has many problems and dangers. For example, the spread of online rumors and false information will lead to social unrest and panic. Internet addiction and addiction will affect people's mental health and social ability. Internet attacks and security problems will affect the safety and stability of society. In addition, the Internet may also lead to regional discrimination and information imbalance because the information on the Internet is often one-sided and inaccurate. Therefore, the question of whether the advantages or disadvantages of the network outweighed the advantages or disadvantages in the debate needed to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the network according to the viewpoint and position of the debater, find out the relationship between the advantages and disadvantages, and try to convince the audience and judges through reasonable arguments and logical reasoning.

The opposing side's second defense is very grateful for the free debate question you provided. Here are some possible questions for your reference: Is it necessary to balance personal interests and professional prospects? If you have to make a choice, which factor do you think should be prioritized? Should personal interests be excluded when choosing a major? If you have to make a choice, which major do you think you should prioritize your personal interests? 3. How to ensure that students don't lose their motivation for majors that have no obvious interest? How to encourage students to pursue their interests while also considering their future employment prospects? Should students who are interested but have poor job prospects choose this major? If students choose this major, will they succeed? Should students 'personal background and adaptability be taken into account when choosing a major? If students don't have enough background and adaptability, can they adapt to the new major?

Honorable judges, dear audience, today, as the first debate of the affirmative side, I will explain to you the point of view that "discipline boosts the development of personality". First, we need to understand the relationship between discipline and personality development. Discipline is an important part of the social system and the foundation of social development and progress. On the other hand, personality development was the comprehensive development of a person's cognition, emotions, behavior, and many other aspects. It was an important way for a person to improve themselves. Thus, discipline and personality development complemented each other. However, in real life, we often find that discipline does not necessarily promote the development of personality in some situations. For example, in some schools, students were strictly disciplined but did not pay attention to the cultivation of students 'personalities. Such strict discipline often suppressed students' creativity and innovative spirit, resulting in students 'lack of independent thinking ability and practical ability. On the contrary, although some enterprises also discipline students, they pay attention to the individual development of employees, allowing employees to freely play in a relaxed environment. This loose discipline often promoted the creativity and innovation of employees and improved the competitiveness of enterprises. Thus, discipline and personality development were inseparable. In society, we should pay attention to cultivating students 'independent thinking ability so that they can judge right and wrong by themselves and decide their own behavior. At the same time, we should also focus on cultivating students 'ability to think independently and create independently. Only in this way can we better promote the development of discipline and personality to achieve the all-round development of people. Thank you!

The issue of making a sequel to a classic (a successful work) was a topic worth discussing. I think it's acceptable to make a sequel to a classic because it can give the audience a better experience. Sequels to classic works could give the audience a chance to see the ending of the story and enjoy the complete storyline. If a film only had one ending, the audience might be disappointed because they couldn't know the future of the story. However, if there was a sequel to this work, the audience could continue to appreciate the story and enjoy the subsequent development. Sequels to classic works could also attract more audiences because sequels could bring new elements and plots to make the story more colorful. Some sequels to classic works were even more successful in attracting more viewers than the first. Sequels to classic works could also maintain their status as classics. If a work only had one ending, it might be forgotten as time passed. However, if there was a sequel to this work, it could maintain its iconic status and continue to attract the interest of the audience. To sum up, I think it's acceptable for a classic (successful work) to make a sequel. Not only could it bring a better experience to the audience, but it could also attract more viewers and maintain the iconic status of the work.

Dear judges and audience, Today, as the opposing party, I would like to explain the pros and cons of middle school students using mobile phones. As a modern communication technology, mobile phones have not only changed our payment methods and entertainment methods, but also provided many conveniences for students. For example, mobile phones could provide students with learning materials and entertainment resources at any time and anywhere, so that students could learn more efficiently. At the same time, mobile phones could also provide social opportunities for students to expand their horizons and improve their overall quality. However, there were also some negative effects of using a mobile phone. First of all, using the phone for too long could easily lead to eye fatigue, cervical vertebra disease, and other problems. Middle school students are still in the growth and development period, and their organs are not fully developed yet. Long-term use of mobile phones will have an irreversible impact on their health. Secondly, excessive use of mobile phones would affect the quality of students 'sleep, resulting in poor mental state and affecting their academic performance. Lastly, excessive use of mobile phones could distract students from their studies. To sum up, there were both pros and cons to the use of mobile phones by middle school students. We should enjoy the convenience of mobile phones while also bearing the negative effects. As a judge, I believe that we should give middle school students a reasonable amount of time to use their phones so that they can use their phones to improve their academic performance and protect their health.

As a positive, you can consider asking the following questions to question the negative: 1 What is "our youth is our own decision"? In this sentence, who should make this decision? What did this decision mean? If youth needs to make decisions, what should these decisions be like? Does it include immoral or inappropriate decisions? If a person can't make his own decision, then is there any meaning to his youth? Are there enough resources for everyone to make their own decisions? If so, where did these resources come from? If not, then why? Should a person be blamed or punished if he cannot make his own decisions? If so, was this accusation or punishment reasonable? 6. Do those who make their own decisions receive the respect and support they deserve? If so, why? If not, then why? Is there enough education and social training to help people make the right decisions? If so, where was the training conducted? If not, then why? If a person's youth is limited or deprived, does he still have the right to pursue his dreams and goals? If so, why? If not, then why? These questions can help you better understand the opposing side's point of view and arguments in order to better debate.

College students participating in volunteer activities focused on training. On the contrary, it could be argued that college students participating in volunteer activities could not directly train their personal abilities, but might waste time and resources. Here are some possible counterarguments: 1. volunteer activities may affect college students 'studies. If college students participated in volunteer activities too frequently, it might take up their time and cause them to be unable to concentrate on their studies. Moreover, volunteer activities usually required a long time to participate in, which would have a certain negative impact on the health of college students. 2. volunteer activities do not provide practical work experience for college students. Although volunteer activities could cultivate college students 'sense of social responsibility and teamwork, these experiences could not be directly converted into professional experience. For most college students, their main goal was to find a job after graduation. Therefore, volunteer activities were not a necessary step in their career planning. 3. volunteer activities can't improve the academic performance of college students. Although volunteer activities can help students build a good sense of community and social responsibility, they can't directly improve students 'academic performance. Many college students participate in volunteer activities to find a better job after graduation rather than to enrich their studies. 4. The voluntary activities can't improve the professional skills of college students. Although volunteer activities can help students develop their leadership and teamwork skills, they cannot directly improve their professional skills. For many college students, they need to learn professional knowledge in school in order to find a better job after graduation. Therefore, volunteer activities were not a necessary step for them to improve their skills.